Is it necessary to harvest additional lymph nodes after resection of the most radioactive sentinel lymph node in breast cancer?

Journal Article (Journal Article)

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists about the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) that should be removed based on radioactivity counts in breast cancer, although the "10% rule" is often used. We hypothesized that the node with the highest radioactivity would have the strongest probability of being a positive SLN, and we sought to determine the lowest radioactive count of a node harboring cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively studied 332 breast cancer patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy by injection of technetium 99m-labeled thiosulfate colloid and sentinel lymphadenectomy (SL) between 1997 and 2006, with intraoperative determination of radioactive counts of nodes by a gamma probe. All SLNs were examined by permanent sections consisting of at least 3 levels of 40- to 100-mum intervals for hematoxylin and eosin evaluation, with or without immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratins. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of patients had more than 1 SLN removed (mean 2.8 per patient); 23.5% had SLN metastasis. Of the node-positive patients, the hottest SLN was positive in 85.9% (67 of 78). Five of the 78 patients (6.4%) with positive nodes had counts less than 10% of those of the hottest node. The lowest radioactive count of a positive SLN was 4.2% of that of the hottest node. Lymphatic mapping based on the 10% rule could greatly improve the false-negative rates compared with removing only the hottest SLN (14.1% versus 6.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Most positive SLNs had the highest radioactivity. Our institutional experience indicates that to obtain an acceptable false-negative rate, nodes should be removed until the 10% rule is met.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Liu, L-C; Lang, JE; Jenkins, T; Lu, Y; Ewing, CA; Hwang, SE; Sokol, S; Alvarado, M; Esserman, LJ; Morita, E; Treseler, P; Leong, SP

Published Date

  • December 2008

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 207 / 6

Start / End Page

  • 853 - 858

PubMed ID

  • 19183531

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1879-1190

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.008


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States