Skip to main content

An intervention study comparing traditional and ergonomic microscopes

Publication ,  Journal Article
James, T; Lamar, S; Marker, T; Frederick, L
Published in: Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennium'
December 1, 2000

In recent years, manufacturers have produced new microscopes with claims of "ergonomic design" for reduced musculoskeletal stress among users. To test this claim, we measured posture of the neck, back, and upper extremities, and the prevalence of musculoskeletal and visual symptoms among cytotechnologists while using traditional microscopes (baseline) and again after the introduction of economically designed microscopes. Participants were five full-time cytotechnologists, who used the microscope 6-8 hours per day and had reported discomfort while using traditional microscopes. Results showed the ergonomically designed microscopes were significantly more comfortable to use than the traditional microscopes for the neck and shoulders. Significant improvement in joint angles of the elbows (flexion) and shoulders (abduction) was noted with the ergonomically designed microscopes. These results suggest that ergonomically designed microscopes may reduce some of the risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and benefit individuals who use microscopes for prolonged periods of time.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennium'

Publication Date

December 1, 2000

Start / End Page

31 / 34
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
James, T., Lamar, S., Marker, T., & Frederick, L. (2000). An intervention study comparing traditional and ergonomic microscopes. Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, “Ergonomics for the New Millennium,” 31–34.
James, T., S. Lamar, T. Marker, and L. Frederick. “An intervention study comparing traditional and ergonomic microscopes.” Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, “Ergonomics for the New Millennium,” December 1, 2000, 31–34.
James T, Lamar S, Marker T, Frederick L. An intervention study comparing traditional and ergonomic microscopes. Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, “Ergonomics for the New Millennium.” 2000 Dec 1;31–4.
James, T., et al. “An intervention study comparing traditional and ergonomic microscopes.” Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, “Ergonomics for the New Millennium,” Dec. 2000, pp. 31–34.
James T, Lamar S, Marker T, Frederick L. An intervention study comparing traditional and ergonomic microscopes. Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, “Ergonomics for the New Millennium.” 2000 Dec 1;31–34.

Published In

Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennium'

Publication Date

December 1, 2000

Start / End Page

31 / 34