Skip to main content

Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schauwecker, DS; Siddiqui, AR; Wagner, JD; Davidson, D; Jung, S-H; Carlson, KA; Hutchins, GD
Published in: Nucl Med Commun
March 2003

One hundred and nineteen patients with malignant melanoma were studied using 2-[ F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET). The images were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization with and without attenuation correction and filtered backprojection with and without attenuation correction. The most probable draining lymph node chains were surgically explored and the tumour volume was quantified at histology. The four different reconstructions of the PET images were retrospectively graded on a five-point scale by two blind readers and compared with the tumour volume. The readers agreed within +/-1 grade 93% (529/568) of the time. Comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves gave 0.698, 0.668, 0.694 and 0.684 for the four reconstruction techniques. The lowest value comparing any pair of the four reconstruction techniques was P=0.371. Thus, none of the reconstruction techniques gave significantly better results than any of the others. The sensitivity of detection was 85% for tumour volumes of 113 m or more (about 6 mm in diameter), but only 4% for tumours less than this size. It can be concluded that the use of attenuation correction gives aesthetically more pleasing images, but the sensitivity and specificity are not significantly improved.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Nucl Med Commun

DOI

ISSN

0143-3636

Publication Date

March 2003

Volume

24

Issue

3

Start / End Page

281 / 289

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, Emission-Computed
  • Skin Neoplasms
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Middle Aged
  • Melanoma
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schauwecker, D. S., Siddiqui, A. R., Wagner, J. D., Davidson, D., Jung, S.-H., Carlson, K. A., & Hutchins, G. D. (2003). Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques. Nucl Med Commun, 24(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-200303000-00008
Schauwecker, D. S., A. R. Siddiqui, J. D. Wagner, D. Davidson, S. -. H. Jung, K. A. Carlson, and G. D. Hutchins. “Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques.Nucl Med Commun 24, no. 3 (March 2003): 281–89. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-200303000-00008.
Schauwecker DS, Siddiqui AR, Wagner JD, Davidson D, Jung S-H, Carlson KA, et al. Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques. Nucl Med Commun. 2003 Mar;24(3):281–9.
Schauwecker, D. S., et al. “Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques.Nucl Med Commun, vol. 24, no. 3, Mar. 2003, pp. 281–89. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/00006231-200303000-00008.
Schauwecker DS, Siddiqui AR, Wagner JD, Davidson D, Jung S-H, Carlson KA, Hutchins GD. Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques. Nucl Med Commun. 2003 Mar;24(3):281–289.

Published In

Nucl Med Commun

DOI

ISSN

0143-3636

Publication Date

March 2003

Volume

24

Issue

3

Start / End Page

281 / 289

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, Emission-Computed
  • Skin Neoplasms
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Middle Aged
  • Melanoma