Skip to main content

Sensitivity of global CO simulations to uncertainties in biomass burning sources

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bian, H; Chin, M; Kawa, SR; Duncan, B; Arellano, A; Kasibhatla, P
Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
December 16, 2007

One of the largest uncertainties for the modeling of tropospheric carbon monoxide (CO) concentration is the timing, location, and magnitude of biomass burning emissions. We investigate the sensitivity of simulated CO in the Unified Chemistry Transport Model (UCTM) to several biomass burning emissions, including four bottom-up and two top-down inventories. We compare the sensitivity experiments with observations from MOPITT, surface and airborne NOAA Global Monitoring Division network data, and the TRACE-P field campaign. The variation of the global annual emissions of these six biomass burning inventories is within 30%; however, their regional variations are often much higher (factor of 2-5). These uncertainties translate to about 6% variation in the global simulated CO but more than a 100% variation in some regions. The annual mean CO variation is greater in the Southern Hemisphere (>12%) than in the Northern Hemisphere (<5%), largely because biomass burning is a higher percentage of the total source in the Southern Hemisphere. Comparisons with CO observations indicate that each model inventory has its strengths and shortcomings, and these regional variations are examined. Overall the model CO concentrations are within the observed range of variability at most stations including Ascension Island, which is strongly influenced by fire emissions. In addition, we discuss the systematic biases that exist in the inventories developed by the similar methodologies and original satellite data. Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

DOI

ISSN

0148-0227

Publication Date

December 16, 2007

Volume

112

Issue

23

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bian, H., Chin, M., Kawa, S. R., Duncan, B., Arellano, A., & Kasibhatla, P. (2007). Sensitivity of global CO simulations to uncertainties in biomass burning sources. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 112(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008376
Bian, H., M. Chin, S. R. Kawa, B. Duncan, A. Arellano, and P. Kasibhatla. “Sensitivity of global CO simulations to uncertainties in biomass burning sources.” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 112, no. 23 (December 16, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008376.
Bian H, Chin M, Kawa SR, Duncan B, Arellano A, Kasibhatla P. Sensitivity of global CO simulations to uncertainties in biomass burning sources. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2007 Dec 16;112(23).
Bian, H., et al. “Sensitivity of global CO simulations to uncertainties in biomass burning sources.” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 112, no. 23, Dec. 2007. Scopus, doi:10.1029/2006JD008376.
Bian H, Chin M, Kawa SR, Duncan B, Arellano A, Kasibhatla P. Sensitivity of global CO simulations to uncertainties in biomass burning sources. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2007 Dec 16;112(23).

Published In

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

DOI

ISSN

0148-0227

Publication Date

December 16, 2007

Volume

112

Issue

23

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences