Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Neurocognitive assessment in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project schizophrenia trial: development, methodology, and rationale.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Keefe, RSE; Mohs, RC; Bilder, RM; Harvey, PD; Green, MF; Meltzer, HY; Gold, JM; Sano, M
Published in: Schizophr Bull
2003

Patients with schizophrenia are severely impaired in crucial aspects of neurocognitive function. This impairment is the strongest clinical correlate of poor long-term outcome and adaptive dysfunction. Reports of neurocognitive enhancement with second generation antipsychotic medications have thus offered promise for improvement in the long-term outcome of patients with schizophrenia. However, the majority of these studies have had serious weaknesses in methodology, such as open-label design, small samples, or inappropriate dosing of medications. More recent studies have addressed these methodological issues but have been of short duration and have largely been sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project is a unique opportunity to address the comparative neurocognitive effectiveness of available antipsychotic medications. This article describes the neurocognitive methods used in the schizophrenia trial of the CATIE project, including the selection and training of neurocognitive raters, patient inclusion criteria for assessment, rationale for the choice of neurocognitive instruments, and methodology for each neurocognitive test.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Schizophr Bull

DOI

ISSN

0586-7614

Publication Date

2003

Volume

29

Issue

1

Start / End Page

45 / 55

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Schizophrenia
  • Psychiatry
  • Patient Selection
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Humans
  • Electronic Data Processing
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Cognition Disorders
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Keefe, R. S. E., Mohs, R. C., Bilder, R. M., Harvey, P. D., Green, M. F., Meltzer, H. Y., … Sano, M. (2003). Neurocognitive assessment in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project schizophrenia trial: development, methodology, and rationale. Schizophr Bull, 29(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006990
Keefe, Richard S. E., Richard C. Mohs, Robert M. Bilder, Philip D. Harvey, Michael F. Green, Herbert Y. Meltzer, James M. Gold, and Mary Sano. “Neurocognitive assessment in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project schizophrenia trial: development, methodology, and rationale.Schizophr Bull 29, no. 1 (2003): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006990.
Keefe, Richard S. E., et al. “Neurocognitive assessment in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project schizophrenia trial: development, methodology, and rationale.Schizophr Bull, vol. 29, no. 1, 2003, pp. 45–55. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006990.
Keefe RSE, Mohs RC, Bilder RM, Harvey PD, Green MF, Meltzer HY, Gold JM, Sano M. Neurocognitive assessment in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project schizophrenia trial: development, methodology, and rationale. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29(1):45–55.
Journal cover image

Published In

Schizophr Bull

DOI

ISSN

0586-7614

Publication Date

2003

Volume

29

Issue

1

Start / End Page

45 / 55

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Schizophrenia
  • Psychiatry
  • Patient Selection
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Humans
  • Electronic Data Processing
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Cognition Disorders
  • Clinical Trials as Topic