Religious and spiritual beliefs of gynecologic oncologists may influence medical decision making.


Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Religious (R) and spiritual (S) beliefs often affect patients' health care decisions, particularly with regard to care at the end of life. Furthermore, patients desire more R/S involvement by the medical community; however, physicians typically do not incorporate R/S assessment into medical interviews with patients. The effects of physicians' R/S beliefs on willingness to participate in controversial clinical practices such as medical abortions and physician-assisted suicide has been evaluated, but how a physician's R/S beliefs may affect other medical decision-making is unclear. METHODS: Using SurveyMonkey, an online survey tool, we surveyed 1972 members of the International Gynecologic Oncologists Society and the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists to determine the R/S characteristics of gynecologic oncologists and whether their R/S beliefs affected their clinical practice. Demographics, religiosity, and spirituality data were collected. Physicians were also asked to evaluate 5 complex case scenarios. RESULTS: : Two hundred seventy-three (14%) physicians responded. Sixty percent "agreed" or "somewhat agreed" that their R/S beliefs were a source of personal comfort. Forty-five percent reported that their R/S beliefs ("sometimes," "frequently," or "always") play a role in the medical options they offered patients, but only 34% "frequently" or "always" take a R/S history from patients. Interestingly, 90% reported that they consider patients' R/S beliefs when discussing end-of-life issues. Responses to case scenarios largely differed by years of experience, although age and R/S beliefs also had influence. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gynecologic oncologists' R/S beliefs may affect patient care but that most physicians fail to take an R/S history from their patients. More work needs to be done to evaluate possible barriers that prevent physicians from taking a spiritual history and engaging in discussions over these matters with patients.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Ramondetta, L; Brown, A; Richardson, G; Urbauer, D; Thaker, PH; Koenig, HG; Gano, JB; Sun, C

Published Date

  • April 2011

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 21 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 573 - 581

PubMed ID

  • 21436706

Pubmed Central ID

  • 21436706

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1525-1438

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31820ba507


  • eng

Conference Location

  • England