Comparison of survival of amiodarone-treated patients with coronary artery disease and malignant ventricular arrhythmias with that of a control group with coronary artery disease.

Although amiodarone is effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, it is associated with serious toxic effects. In addition, the prognosis of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias and coronary artery disease treated with amiodarone remains poor. The survival of 54 consecutive patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and symptomatic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation treated with amiodarone was compared with that of 5,125 medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. The amiodarone group was older, with worse left ventricular function and more peripheral and cerebrovascular disease. The 1 year survival probability was 0.73 for the amiodarone group and 0.94 for the control coronary artery disease group. At 2 years of follow-up, the survival probabilities were 0.60 and 0.90 for the amiodarone and the control group, respectively. When the survival curves were adjusted for group differences in baseline prognostic characteristics (integrated as a previously published hazard score), there was no difference in the prognosis of the two groups. These findings suggest that treatment with amiodarone of malignant ventricular arrhythmias associated with coronary artery disease maintains patients on an underlying survival curve determined by the degree of myocardial dysfunction, clinical characteristics and coronary anatomy, and that amiodarone does not have a deleterious effect on survival.

Duke Scholars

Author Kerry L. Lee Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Division of Biostatistics