Defining translational research: implications for training.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

Because translational research is not clearly defined, developers of translational research programs are struggling to articulate specific program objectives, delineate the knowledge and skills (competencies) that trainees are expected to develop, create an appropriate curriculum, and track outcomes to assess whether program objectives and competency requirements are being met. Members of the Evaluation Committee of the Association for Clinical Research Training (ACRT) reviewed current definitions of translational research and proposed an operational definition to use in the educational framework. In this article, the authors posit that translational research fosters the multidirectional and multidisciplinary integration of basic research, patient-oriented research, and population-based research, with the long-term aim of improving the health of the public. The authors argue that the approach to designing and evaluating the success of translational training programs must therefore be flexible enough to accommodate the needs of individual institutions and individual trainees within the institutions but that it must also be rigorous enough to document that the program is meeting its short-, intermediate-, and long-term objectives and that its trainees are meeting preestablished competency requirements. A logic model is proposed for the evaluation of translational research programs.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Rubio, DM; Schoenbaum, EE; Lee, LS; Schteingart, DE; Marantz, PR; Anderson, KE; Platt, LD; Baez, A; Esposito, K

Published Date

  • March 2010

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 85 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 470 - 475

PubMed ID

  • 20182120

Pubmed Central ID

  • PMC2829707

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1938-808X

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccd618


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States