Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

Three studies examined the effects of perceived procedural justice and the favorability of a group-level outcome on the endorsement of a group-level decision and the evaluation of the authority responsible for the decision. Results showed that, contrary to findings usually seen with individual-level decisions, collective outcome favorability was more important than procedural justice in influencing the endorsement of the decision. Furthermore, increased identification with the group reduced the importance of procedural justice but accentuated the importance of collective outcome favorability. With regard to the evaluation of the authority, the results were similar to those obtained in individual-level decisions: Procedural fairness mattered more than collective outcome favorability.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Leung, K; Tong, K-K; Lind, EA

Published Date

  • March 2007

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 92 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 476 - 489

PubMed ID

  • 17352604

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1939-1315

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0022-3514

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.476


  • eng