Skip to main content

Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lind, EA; Tyler, TR; Huo, YJ
Published in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
January 1, 1997

T. R. Tyler and E. A. Lind (1992) identified 3 relational variables that make authoritative procedures seem fair: indications of status recognition, trust in benevolence, and neutrality in decision making. In Study 1, students from the United States, Germany, and Hong Kong recalled a conflict and reported their reactions. In Study 2, U.S. and Japanese students rated 3rd-party and dyadic procedures as ways of resolving a hypothetical dispute. In both studies, trust in benevolence correlated more strongly with procedural justice judgments in 3rd-party procedures. Study 2 showed stronger links between status recognition and procedural justice in the U.S. sample. In both studies, the relational variables appeared to mediate the effects of voice on procedural justice judgments. The results suggest that the basic processes posited in the theory generalize to dyadic conflict situations and across cultural contexts. Copyright 1997 by the American Psychological Association, Inc.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

DOI

ISSN

0022-3514

Publication Date

January 1, 1997

Volume

73

Issue

4

Start / End Page

767 / 780

Related Subject Headings

  • Social Psychology
  • 5205 Social and personality psychology
  • 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
  • 1702 Cognitive Sciences
  • 1701 Psychology
  • 1505 Marketing
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 767–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.767
Lind, E. A., T. R. Tyler, and Y. J. Huo. “Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, no. 4 (January 1, 1997): 767–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.767.
Lind EA, Tyler TR, Huo YJ. Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997 Jan 1;73(4):767–80.
Lind, E. A., et al. “Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 73, no. 4, Jan. 1997, pp. 767–80. Scopus, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.767.
Lind EA, Tyler TR, Huo YJ. Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997 Jan 1;73(4):767–780.

Published In

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

DOI

ISSN

0022-3514

Publication Date

January 1, 1997

Volume

73

Issue

4

Start / End Page

767 / 780

Related Subject Headings

  • Social Psychology
  • 5205 Social and personality psychology
  • 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
  • 1702 Cognitive Sciences
  • 1701 Psychology
  • 1505 Marketing