Variation in outcomes for benchmark operations: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.

Published

Journal Article

BACKGROUND: We evaluated outcomes for common operations in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (STS-CHSDB) to provide contemporary benchmarks and examine variation between centers. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery from 2005 to 2009 were included. Centers with greater than 10% missing data were excluded. Discharge mortality and postoperative length of stay (PLOS) among patients discharged alive were calculated for 8 benchmark operations of varying complexity. Power for analyzing between-center variation in outcome was determined for each operation. Variation was evaluated using funnel plots and Bayesian hierarchical modeling. RESULTS: Eighteen thousand three hundred seventy-five index operations at 74 centers were included in the analysis of 8 benchmark operations. Overall discharge mortality was: ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair = 0.6% (range, 0% to 5.1%), tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair = 1.1% (range, 0% to 16.7%), complete atrioventricular canal repair (AVC) = 2.2% (range, 0% to 20%), arterial switch operation (ASO) = 2.9% (range, 0% to 50%), ASO + VSD = 7.0% (range, 0% to 100%), Fontan operation = 1.3% (range, 0% to 9.1%), truncus arteriosus repair = 10.9% (0% to 100%), and Norwood procedure = 19.3% (range, 0% to 100%). Funnel plots revealed that the number of centers characterized as outliers were VSD = 0, TOF = 0, AVC = 1, ASO = 3, ASO + VSD = 1, Fontan operation = 0, truncus arteriosus repair = 4, and Norwood procedure = 11. Power calculations showed that statistically meaningful comparisons of mortality rates between centers could be made only for the Norwood procedure, for which the Bayesian-estimated range (95% probability interval) after risk-adjustment was 7.0% (3.7% to 10.3%) to 41.6% (30.6% to 57.2%). Between-center variation in PLOS was analyzed for all operations and was larger for more complex operations. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis documents contemporary benchmarks for common pediatric cardiac surgical operations and the range of outcomes among centers. Variation was most prominent for the more complex operations. These data may aid in quality assessment and quality improvement initiatives.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Jacobs, JP; O'Brien, SM; Pasquali, SK; Jacobs, ML; Lacour-Gayet, FG; Tchervenkov, CI; Austin, EH; Pizarro, C; Pourmoghadam, KK; Scholl, FG; Welke, KF; Mavroudis, C

Published Date

  • December 2011

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 92 / 6

Start / End Page

  • 2184 - 2191

PubMed ID

  • 22115229

Pubmed Central ID

  • 22115229

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1552-6259

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.008

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • Netherlands