Skip to main content

Methods for transferring patient and plan data between radiotherapy treatment planning systems

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bedford, JL; Oldham, M; Hoess, A; Evans, PM; Shentall, GS; Webb, S
Published in: British Journal of Radiology
1997

The effectiveness of conformai radiotherapy can ultimately only be assessed by the use of clinical trials. As large multicentre clinical trials become more widespread, methods of transferring patient and plan data between radiotherapy treatment planning systems become increasingly important. In this paper, the general strategy for the transfer of data is discussed, and also illustrated with reference to two specific systems: TARGET 2 (GE Medical Systems) and VOXELPLAN (DKFZ-Heidelberg). The transfer method involves using a computer program to translate the data formats used by each of the two systems for CT scans, patient outlines, plan information and block descriptions. This paper does not address the question of transferring beam data between systems: beam data must first be entered separately into both machines. The physical concepts encountered when transferring plans are described, with specific reference to the two planning systems used. Differences in the strategies used by the two planning systems for definition of irregular field shapes are compared. The dose calculations used by the two systems are also briefly evaluated. Isodoses produced by VOXELPLAN around a circular target volume are found to be up to 3 mm different in location to those produced by TARGET 2, owing to the use of a smooth field shape contour as opposed to a stepped field shape which closely models the leaves of a multileaf collimator. In general, dose distributions generated by both systems are comparable, but some differences are found in the presence of large tissue inhomogeneities. It is concluded that the transfer of patient and plan data between two different treatment planning systems is feasible, provided that any differences in field shape definition methods or dose calculation methods between the two systems are understood. © 1997 The British Institute of Radiology.

Duke Scholars

Published In

British Journal of Radiology

ISSN

0007-1285

Publication Date

1997

Volume

70

Issue

JULY

Start / End Page

740 / 749

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bedford, J. L., Oldham, M., Hoess, A., Evans, P. M., Shentall, G. S., & Webb, S. (1997). Methods for transferring patient and plan data between radiotherapy treatment planning systems. British Journal of Radiology, 70(JULY), 740–749.
Bedford, J. L., M. Oldham, A. Hoess, P. M. Evans, G. S. Shentall, and S. Webb. “Methods for transferring patient and plan data between radiotherapy treatment planning systems.” British Journal of Radiology 70, no. JULY (1997): 740–49.
Bedford JL, Oldham M, Hoess A, Evans PM, Shentall GS, Webb S. Methods for transferring patient and plan data between radiotherapy treatment planning systems. British Journal of Radiology. 1997;70(JULY):740–9.
Bedford, J. L., et al. “Methods for transferring patient and plan data between radiotherapy treatment planning systems.” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 70, no. JULY, 1997, pp. 740–49.
Bedford JL, Oldham M, Hoess A, Evans PM, Shentall GS, Webb S. Methods for transferring patient and plan data between radiotherapy treatment planning systems. British Journal of Radiology. 1997;70(JULY):740–749.

Published In

British Journal of Radiology

ISSN

0007-1285

Publication Date

1997

Volume

70

Issue

JULY

Start / End Page

740 / 749

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences