Efficiency and equity in negotiated resource transfers: Contributions and limitations of trust with limited contracts

Journal Article

We consider a case of water reallocation in Brazil, one which has numerous analogs elsewhere. To permit empirical study of the effects of institutions that can facilitate or restrict allocations, we conducted field experiments to explore trust's potential when resource contracts are limited, using a novel asymmetric-productivity ultimatum game with a final surplus-sharing step added. As a form of informal institution, trust could in principle make rights and contracts unnecessary. We observe whether trust in compensation is in fact expected and expressed. We also explore whether trust is exploited, and the effect of communication, within our two bargaining structures: (1) no communication; and (2) with a non-binding message concerning the surplus to be shared. We see that our participants both expect and express trust that some of the surplus will be shared. Trust raises total output and some surplus is indeed shared: those who trust gain a bit on average; and the more trust was shown, the more was shared. However, often the trust was barely repaid. Further, the messages-found to help in other research-had little impact and were often untrue. In sum, trust does matter but both efficiency and equity could well rise with complete contracts. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Pfaff, A; Vélez, MA

Published Date

  • 2012

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 74 /

Start / End Page

  • 55 - 63

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0921-8009

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.009