Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy: developments of the technique in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

Published

Journal Article

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The complete removal of the stone is the ultimate goal in management, a result that might not be attained even after several sessions of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and/or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and/or retrograde intrarenal surgery (ureteroscopy). The objective of this study is to assess our technique of anatrophic nephrolithotomy, with decreased renal ischemia and reduced patient morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2010, we performed eight anatrophic laparoscopic nephrolithotomies in adult patients with staghorn renal calculus. The mean patient age was 49 years (range 35-62 y). The mean stone size was 53 mm (range 35-70 mm). All patients had complex renal calculi, with stones occupying more than 80% of the caliceal system. In all cases, a Double-J stent was placed before surgery. After clamping the hilum, the incision was made laterally and longitudinally through full thickness of cortex using a laparoscopic scalpel. A running cortical suture was performed with Hem-o-lok reinforcement. Renal function was assessed in three patients, using renography with technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA), before and 3 months after the surgery. RESULTS: Procedures for all patients were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 142.5 minutes, and the mean warm ischemia time was 20.8 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 315 mL. The hospital stay average was 3.5 days. Only one patient had a complication--a vascular fistula with permanent postoperative hematuria. This patient subsequently underwent successful endovascular embolization. Residual stones were identified in 37% of cases (three patients) during follow-up imaging at 15 days. There were minimal changes on serum creatinine values. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery is feasible when anatrophic nephrolithotomy is indicated. This technique minimizes the barriers of an open flank incision, while achieving excellent stone-free rates. This minimally invasive technique should be considered for complex stones that would necessitate multiple renal access tracks and secondary procedures.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Giedelman, C; Arriaga, J; Carmona, O; de Andrade, R; Banda, E; Lopez, R; Preminger, G; Sotelo, RJ

Published Date

  • May 2012

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 26 / 5

Start / End Page

  • 444 - 450

PubMed ID

  • 22142215

Pubmed Central ID

  • 22142215

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1557-900X

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1089/end.2011.0193

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States