Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Purves, D; Lotto, RB; Williams, SM; Nundy, S; Yang, Z
Published in: Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
March 2001

Many otherwise puzzling aspects of the way we see brightness, colour, orientation and motion can be understood in wholly empirical terms. The evidence reviewed here leads to the conclusion that visual percepts are based on patterns of reflex neural activity shaped entirely by the past success (or failure) of visually guided behaviour in response to the same or a similar retinal stimulus. As a result, the images we see accord with what the sources of the stimuli have typically turned out to be, rather than with the physical properties of the relevant objects. If vision does indeed depend upon this operational strategy to generate optimally useful perceptions of inevitably ambiguous stimuli, then the underlying neurobiological processes will eventually need to be understood within this conceptual framework.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences

DOI

EISSN

1471-2970

ISSN

0962-8436

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

356

Issue

1407

Start / End Page

285 / 297

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Perception
  • Vision, Ocular
  • Humans
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Color
  • Animals
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Purves, D., Lotto, R. B., Williams, S. M., Nundy, S., & Yang, Z. (2001). Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 356(1407), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0772
Purves, D., R. B. Lotto, S. M. Williams, S. Nundy, and Z. Yang. “Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 356, no. 1407 (March 2001): 285–97. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0772.
Purves D, Lotto RB, Williams SM, Nundy S, Yang Z. Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2001 Mar;356(1407):285–97.
Purves, D., et al. “Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 356, no. 1407, Mar. 2001, pp. 285–97. Epmc, doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0772.
Purves D, Lotto RB, Williams SM, Nundy S, Yang Z. Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2001 Mar;356(1407):285–297.
Journal cover image

Published In

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences

DOI

EISSN

1471-2970

ISSN

0962-8436

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

356

Issue

1407

Start / End Page

285 / 297

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Perception
  • Vision, Ocular
  • Humans
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Color
  • Animals
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences