Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparing effectiveness of experimental and implemented bycatch reduction measures: the ideal and the real.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cox, TM; Lewison, RL; Zydelis, R; Crowder, LB; Safina, C; Read, AJ
Published in: Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
October 2007

Fishers, scientists, and resource managers have made substantial progress in reducing bycatch of sea turtles, seabirds, and marine mammals through physical modifications to fishing gear. Many bycatch-avoidance measures have been developed and tested successfully in controlled experiments, which have led to regulated implementation of modified or new fishing gear. Nevertheless, successful bycatch experiments may not translate to effective mitigation in commercial fisheries because experimental conditions are relaxed in commercial fishing operations. Such a difference between experimental results and real-world results with fishing fleets may have serious consequences for management and conservation of protected species taken as bycatch. We evaluated preimplementation experimental measures and postimplementation efficacy from primary and gray literature for three case studies: acoustic pingers that warn marine mammals of the presence of gill nets, turtle excluder devices that reduce bycatch of turtles in trawls, and various measures to reduce seabird bycatch in longlines. Three common themes to successful implementation of bycatch reduction measures are long-standing collaborations among the fishing industry, scientists, and resource managers; pre- and postimplementation monitoring; and compliance via enforcement and incentives.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

DOI

EISSN

1523-1739

ISSN

0888-8892

Publication Date

October 2007

Volume

21

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1155 / 1164

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Turtles
  • Mammals
  • Fishes
  • Fisheries
  • Ecology
  • Birds
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Australia
  • Antarctic Regions
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cox, T. M., Lewison, R. L., Zydelis, R., Crowder, L. B., Safina, C., & Read, A. J. (2007). Comparing effectiveness of experimental and implemented bycatch reduction measures: the ideal and the real. Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 21(5), 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00772.x
Cox, T. M., R. L. Lewison, R. Zydelis, L. B. Crowder, C. Safina, and A. J. Read. “Comparing effectiveness of experimental and implemented bycatch reduction measures: the ideal and the real.Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 21, no. 5 (October 2007): 1155–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00772.x.
Cox TM, Lewison RL, Zydelis R, Crowder LB, Safina C, Read AJ. Comparing effectiveness of experimental and implemented bycatch reduction measures: the ideal and the real. Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. 2007 Oct;21(5):1155–64.
Cox, T. M., et al. “Comparing effectiveness of experimental and implemented bycatch reduction measures: the ideal and the real.Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, vol. 21, no. 5, Oct. 2007, pp. 1155–64. Epmc, doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00772.x.
Cox TM, Lewison RL, Zydelis R, Crowder LB, Safina C, Read AJ. Comparing effectiveness of experimental and implemented bycatch reduction measures: the ideal and the real. Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. 2007 Oct;21(5):1155–1164.
Journal cover image

Published In

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

DOI

EISSN

1523-1739

ISSN

0888-8892

Publication Date

October 2007

Volume

21

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1155 / 1164

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Turtles
  • Mammals
  • Fishes
  • Fisheries
  • Ecology
  • Birds
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Australia
  • Antarctic Regions