Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Hydrologic, edaphic, and vegetative responses to microtopographic reestablishment in a restored wetland

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bruland, GL; Richardson, CJ
Published in: Restoration Ecology
September 1, 2005

Microtopography is a characteristic feature of many natural wetlands that is commonly lacking in restored wetlands (RWs). Consequently, it has been suggested that microtopography must be reestablished in RWs to accelerate the development of wetland function. The objective of this research was to examine responses of hydrology, soils, and vegetation to microtopographic reestablishment at a 3-year-old RW site in North Carolina. Microtopography was reestablished by configuring hummocks (mounds) and hollows (depressions), on otherwise level terrain (flats) of intermediate elevation. For most of the 2003 growing season, mean water table depths were below the soil surface in the flats and 10 cm above the soil surface in the hollows. Analysis of variance revealed significant microtopography by time interactions for soil temperature (p < 0.05) and moisture (p < 0.001), indicating that differences between zones were not consistent throughout the growing season. Hummocks had significantly higher nitrate (p < 0.0001) and ammonium (p = 0.001) than flats and hollows for most of the growing season. Differences in microbial biomass carbon and denitrification enzyme activity across the microtopographic zones were not detected. Plant species richness was significantly different (p < 0.001) across the microtopographic zones, with hummocks < hollows < fiats. Flats supported the greatest numbers of wetland species. Aboveground biomass differed significantly (p < 0.001) across the microtopographic zones and followed a different pattern than richness: hummocks < flats < hollows, owing to the growth of emergent wetland herbs in hollows. © 2005 Society for Ecological Restoration International.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Restoration Ecology

DOI

EISSN

1526-100X

ISSN

1061-2971

Publication Date

September 1, 2005

Volume

13

Issue

3

Start / End Page

515 / 523

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 41 Environmental sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bruland, G. L., & Richardson, C. J. (2005). Hydrologic, edaphic, and vegetative responses to microtopographic reestablishment in a restored wetland. Restoration Ecology, 13(3), 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00064.x
Bruland, G. L., and C. J. Richardson. “Hydrologic, edaphic, and vegetative responses to microtopographic reestablishment in a restored wetland.” Restoration Ecology 13, no. 3 (September 1, 2005): 515–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00064.x.
Bruland GL, Richardson CJ. Hydrologic, edaphic, and vegetative responses to microtopographic reestablishment in a restored wetland. Restoration Ecology. 2005 Sep 1;13(3):515–23.
Bruland, G. L., and C. J. Richardson. “Hydrologic, edaphic, and vegetative responses to microtopographic reestablishment in a restored wetland.” Restoration Ecology, vol. 13, no. 3, Sept. 2005, pp. 515–23. Scopus, doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00064.x.
Bruland GL, Richardson CJ. Hydrologic, edaphic, and vegetative responses to microtopographic reestablishment in a restored wetland. Restoration Ecology. 2005 Sep 1;13(3):515–523.
Journal cover image

Published In

Restoration Ecology

DOI

EISSN

1526-100X

ISSN

1061-2971

Publication Date

September 1, 2005

Volume

13

Issue

3

Start / End Page

515 / 523

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 41 Environmental sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences