Skip to main content

Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Rosette, AS; Tost, LP
Published in: The Journal of applied psychology
March 2010

The authors contribute to the ongoing debate about the existence of a female leadership advantage by specifying contextual factors that moderate the likelihood of the emergence of such an advantage. The investigation considered whether the perceived role incongruence between the female gender role and the leader role led to a female leader disadvantage (as predicted by role congruity theory) or whether instead a female leader advantage would emerge (as predicted by double standards and stereotype content research). In Study 1, it was only when success was internally attributed that women top leaders were evaluated as more agentic and more communal than men top leaders. Study 2 showed that the favorable ratings were unique to top-level positions and further showed that the effect on agentic traits was mediated by perceptions of double standards, while the effect on communal traits was mediated by expectations of feminized management skills. Finally, Study 2 showed that top women leaders were evaluated most favorably on overall leader effectiveness, and this effect was mediated by both mediators. Our results support the existence of a qualified female leadership advantage.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

The Journal of applied psychology

DOI

EISSN

1939-1854

ISSN

0021-9010

Publication Date

March 2010

Volume

95

Issue

2

Start / End Page

221 / 235

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Women, Working
  • Stereotyping
  • Prejudice
  • Male
  • Leadership
  • Internal-External Control
  • Humans
  • Gender Identity
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Rosette, A. S., & Tost, L. P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018204
Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby, and Leigh Plunkett Tost. “Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.The Journal of Applied Psychology 95, no. 2 (March 2010): 221–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018204.
Rosette AS, Tost LP. Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. The Journal of applied psychology. 2010 Mar;95(2):221–35.
Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby, and Leigh Plunkett Tost. “Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.The Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 95, no. 2, Mar. 2010, pp. 221–35. Epmc, doi:10.1037/a0018204.
Rosette AS, Tost LP. Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. The Journal of applied psychology. 2010 Mar;95(2):221–235.

Published In

The Journal of applied psychology

DOI

EISSN

1939-1854

ISSN

0021-9010

Publication Date

March 2010

Volume

95

Issue

2

Start / End Page

221 / 235

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Women, Working
  • Stereotyping
  • Prejudice
  • Male
  • Leadership
  • Internal-External Control
  • Humans
  • Gender Identity
  • Female