Skip to main content

Inter-reader variability in Alternate Forced Choice studies

Publication ,  Journal Article
Huda, W; Ogden, KM; Samei, E; Scalzetti, EM; Lavallee, RL; Roskopf, ML
Published in: Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
June 23, 2008

In this study, we investigated differences in detection performance for twelve observers who each generated a CT contrast detail curve. An anthropomorphic newborn phantom's abdomen was imaged using a GE Light Speed CT scanner (4-slice). Alternate Forced Choice (AFC) experiments were performed with lesions sizes ranging from 2.5 to 12.5 mm to determine the intensity needed to achieve 92% correct (I92%). Following training, twelve readers consisting of (2 technologists, 4 college students, 4 medical students, and 2 radiology residents) generated a single contrast detail curve. Eight readers produced approximately linear contrast detail curves while the remaining four readers required a second order polynomial fit because of reduced performance when detecting the largest (i.e., 12.5 mm) lesion. For the three smallest lesions, the coefficient of variation between the twelve readers was ∼12%, which increases with increasing lesion size to ∼23% for 12.5 mm lesion size. The ratio of the maximum I92%.to minimum I92% values was ∼1.6 for the smallest lesions, which increased to a factor of ∼2.1 for the 12.5 mm lesion. Our results show that minimizing inter-reader variability in our AFC experiments could be achieved by eliminating the largest lesion that cause detection problems in one third of observers. The combined experimental data showed that the slope of the contrast detail curve was -0.42, lower than the value of -1.0 predicted by the Rose model, suggesting that the noise texture in CT associated with both quantum mottle and anatomic structure is an important factor affecting detection of these lesions.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

DOI

ISSN

1605-7422

Publication Date

June 23, 2008

Volume

6917
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Huda, W., Ogden, K. M., Samei, E., Scalzetti, E. M., Lavallee, R. L., & Roskopf, M. L. (2008). Inter-reader variability in Alternate Forced Choice studies. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, 6917. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770618
Huda, W., K. M. Ogden, E. Samei, E. M. Scalzetti, R. L. Lavallee, and M. L. Roskopf. “Inter-reader variability in Alternate Forced Choice studies.” Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE 6917 (June 23, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770618.
Huda W, Ogden KM, Samei E, Scalzetti EM, Lavallee RL, Roskopf ML. Inter-reader variability in Alternate Forced Choice studies. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 2008 Jun 23;6917.
Huda, W., et al. “Inter-reader variability in Alternate Forced Choice studies.” Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 6917, June 2008. Scopus, doi:10.1117/12.770618.
Huda W, Ogden KM, Samei E, Scalzetti EM, Lavallee RL, Roskopf ML. Inter-reader variability in Alternate Forced Choice studies. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 2008 Jun 23;6917.

Published In

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

DOI

ISSN

1605-7422

Publication Date

June 23, 2008

Volume

6917