Can continuous quality improvement be assessed using randomized trials? [see comment]

Published

Journal Article

STUDY QUESTION: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) has been implemented at least to some degree in many health care settings, yet randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CQI are rare. We ask whether, when, and how RCTs of CQI might be designed. STUDY DESIGN: We consider two applications of CQI: as a general philosophy of management and (by analogy with the use of conceptual models from the behavioral sciences) as a conceptual model for developing specific interventions. The example of warfarin therapy for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation is used throughout. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: While it is impractical to use RCTs to study CQI as a general management philosophy, RCT methodology is appropriate for studying CQI as a conceptual model for generating interventions. RCTs of CQI might be considered when the process change under consideration is very large, its implications (e.g., in terms of cost, outcomes of care, etc.) are very great, and the best approach is uncertain. When designing RCTs of CQI, critical decisions include (1) the unit of randomization; (2) whether the focus is on CQI as a method for generating interventions or, instead, is on specific interventions in and of themselves; and (3) the flexibility available to local personnel to modify the intervention's operational details. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs of CQI as a conceptual model for generating interventions are feasible.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Samsa, G; Matchar, D

Published Date

  • August 2000

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 35 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 687 - 700

PubMed ID

  • 10966090

Pubmed Central ID

  • 10966090

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1475-6773

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0017-9124

Language

  • eng