Should the definition for the negative likelihood ratio be changed?
Publication
, Journal Article
Delgado-Rodríguez, M; Almaraz, A; Fariñas-Alvarez, C
Published in: J Clin Epidemiol
June 1997
Duke Scholars
Published In
J Clin Epidemiol
ISSN
0895-4356
Publication Date
June 1997
Volume
50
Issue
6
Start / End Page
641 / 642
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Terminology as Topic
- Risk
- ROC Curve
- Probability
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Odds Ratio
- Mathematical Computing
- Epidemiology
- 4202 Epidemiology
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Delgado-Rodríguez, M., Almaraz, A., & Fariñas-Alvarez, C. (1997). Should the definition for the negative likelihood ratio be changed? J Clin Epidemiol, 50(6), 641–642.
Delgado-Rodríguez, M., A. Almaraz, and C. Fariñas-Alvarez. “Should the definition for the negative likelihood ratio be changed?” J Clin Epidemiol 50, no. 6 (June 1997): 641–42.
Delgado-Rodríguez M, Almaraz A, Fariñas-Alvarez C. Should the definition for the negative likelihood ratio be changed? J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;50(6):641–2.
Delgado-Rodríguez, M., et al. “Should the definition for the negative likelihood ratio be changed?” J Clin Epidemiol, vol. 50, no. 6, June 1997, pp. 641–42.
Delgado-Rodríguez M, Almaraz A, Fariñas-Alvarez C. Should the definition for the negative likelihood ratio be changed? J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;50(6):641–642.
Published In
J Clin Epidemiol
ISSN
0895-4356
Publication Date
June 1997
Volume
50
Issue
6
Start / End Page
641 / 642
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Terminology as Topic
- Risk
- ROC Curve
- Probability
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Odds Ratio
- Mathematical Computing
- Epidemiology
- 4202 Epidemiology
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences