Impacts of managed care patient protection laws on health services utilization and patient satisfaction with care.

Published

Journal Article

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of patient protection laws implemented by the vast majority of states during the 1990s on the public's satisfaction and trust relating to health care, and on key utilization measures. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Measures of individuals' health care utilization and satisfaction, and control variables, came from three waves of the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Household Surveys conducted in 1996-1997, 1998-1999, and 2000-2001. The CTS was conducted in 60 randomly selected communities, throughout the U.S. In addition, a supplemental national sample of households from CTS was also included, resulting in a combined sample with cases from 48 states and the District of Columbia. After applying exclusion restrictions, the analysis sample was 149,688 adults. STUDY DESIGN: Using a fixed-effects methodology, we assessed the influence of patient protection laws on satisfaction with care and utilization of services for the entire sample and for subsamples of persons in poor health, with low income, and who were enrolled in HMOs. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: One of the authors (Hall) compiled relevant laws in all U.S. states through 2001 from primary legal sources, checking for accuracy by conducting independent research on statutory changes and by asking three to five regulators in each state to verify that the information was correct. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Overall, patient protection laws had little or no effect on either trust, satisfaction with care, or utilization. Significance was found postenactment of a state patient protection law only for emergency room visits in the general sample, and only for physician trust in the low-income sample. Because of the number of possible associations examined, occasional findings of significance could occur by chance. CONCLUSIONS: Enactment of managed care patient protection laws did not generally increase utilization of health services or improve patient satisfaction with care.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Sloan, FA; Rattliff, JR; Hall, MA

Published Date

  • June 2005

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 40 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 647 - 667

PubMed ID

  • 15960684

Pubmed Central ID

  • 15960684

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1475-6773

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0017-9124

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00378.x

Language

  • eng