Skip to main content
Journal cover image

How reliable and robust are current biomarkers for copper status?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Danzeisen, R; Araya, M; Harrison, B; Keen, C; Solioz, M; Thiele, D; McArdle, HJ
Published in: The British journal of nutrition
October 2007

Cu is an essential nutrient for man, but can be toxic if intakes are too high. In sensitive populations, marginal over- or under-exposure can have detrimental effects. Malnourished children, the elderly, and pregnant or lactating females may be susceptible for Cu deficiency. Cu status and exposure in the population can currently not be easily measured, as neither plasma Cu nor plasma cuproenzymes reflect Cu status precisely. Some blood markers (such as ceruloplasmin) indicate severe Cu depletion, but do not inversely respond to Cu excess, and are not suitable to indicate marginal states. A biomarker of Cu is needed that is sensitive to small changes in Cu status, and that responds to Cu excess as well as deficiency. Such a marker will aid in monitoring Cu status in large populations, and will help to avoid chronic health effects (for example, liver damage in chronic toxicity, osteoporosis, loss of collagen stability, or increased susceptibility to infections in deficiency). The advent of high-throughput technologies has enabled us to screen for potential biomarkers in the whole proteome of a cell, not excluding markers that have no direct link to Cu. Further, this screening allows us to search for a whole group of proteins that, in combination, reflect Cu status. The present review emphasises the need to find sensitive biomarkers for Cu, examines potential markers of Cu status already available, and discusses methods to identify a novel suite of biomarkers.

Published In

The British journal of nutrition

DOI

EISSN

1475-2662

ISSN

0007-1145

Publication Date

October 2007

Volume

98

Issue

4

Start / End Page

676 / 683

Related Subject Headings

  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Nutrition & Dietetics
  • Molecular Chaperones
  • Male
  • Liver
  • Interleukin-2
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Copper
  • Ceruloplasmin
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Danzeisen, R., Araya, M., Harrison, B., Keen, C., Solioz, M., Thiele, D., & McArdle, H. J. (2007). How reliable and robust are current biomarkers for copper status? The British Journal of Nutrition, 98(4), 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114507798951
Danzeisen, Ruth, Magdalena Araya, Brenda Harrison, Carl Keen, Marc Solioz, Dennis Thiele, and Harry J. McArdle. “How reliable and robust are current biomarkers for copper status?The British Journal of Nutrition 98, no. 4 (October 2007): 676–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114507798951.
Danzeisen R, Araya M, Harrison B, Keen C, Solioz M, Thiele D, et al. How reliable and robust are current biomarkers for copper status? The British journal of nutrition. 2007 Oct;98(4):676–83.
Danzeisen, Ruth, et al. “How reliable and robust are current biomarkers for copper status?The British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 98, no. 4, Oct. 2007, pp. 676–83. Epmc, doi:10.1017/s0007114507798951.
Danzeisen R, Araya M, Harrison B, Keen C, Solioz M, Thiele D, McArdle HJ. How reliable and robust are current biomarkers for copper status? The British journal of nutrition. 2007 Oct;98(4):676–683.
Journal cover image

Published In

The British journal of nutrition

DOI

EISSN

1475-2662

ISSN

0007-1145

Publication Date

October 2007

Volume

98

Issue

4

Start / End Page

676 / 683

Related Subject Headings

  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Nutrition & Dietetics
  • Molecular Chaperones
  • Male
  • Liver
  • Interleukin-2
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Copper
  • Ceruloplasmin