Skip to main content
Journal cover image

How bad is depression? Preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Pyne, JM; Fortney, JC; Tripathi, S; Feeny, D; Ubel, P; Brazier, J
Published in: Health services research
August 2009

To compare depression health state preference scores across four groups: (1) general population, (2) previous history of depression but not currently depressed, (3) less severe current depression, and (4) more severe current depression.Primary data were collected from 95 general population, 163 primary care, and 83 specialty mental health subjects.Stratified sampling frames were used to recruit general population and patient subjects. Subjects completed cross-sectional surveys. Key variables included rating scale and standard gamble scores assigned to depression health state descriptions developed from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and SF-12.Each subject completed an in-person interview. Forty-nine subjects completed test/retest reliability interviews.Depressed patient preference scores for three of six SF-12 depression health states were significantly lower than the general population using the rating scale and two of six were significantly lower using standard gamble. Depressed patient scores for five of six PHQ-9 depression health states were significantly lower than the general population using the rating scale and two of six were significantly lower using standard gamble.Depressed patients report lower preference scores for depression health states than the general population. In effect, they perceived depression to be worse than the general public perceived it to be. Additional research is needed to examine the implications for cost-effectiveness ratios using general population preference scores versus depressed patient preference scores.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Health services research

DOI

EISSN

1475-6773

ISSN

0017-9124

Publication Date

August 2009

Volume

44

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1406 / 1423

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Sex Distribution
  • Reference Values
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Female
  • Depression
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pyne, J. M., Fortney, J. C., Tripathi, S., Feeny, D., Ubel, P., & Brazier, J. (2009). How bad is depression? Preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population. Health Services Research, 44(4), 1406–1423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00974.x
Pyne, Jeffrey M., John C. Fortney, Shanti Tripathi, David Feeny, Peter Ubel, and John Brazier. “How bad is depression? Preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population.Health Services Research 44, no. 4 (August 2009): 1406–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00974.x.
Pyne JM, Fortney JC, Tripathi S, Feeny D, Ubel P, Brazier J. How bad is depression? Preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population. Health services research. 2009 Aug;44(4):1406–23.
Pyne, Jeffrey M., et al. “How bad is depression? Preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population.Health Services Research, vol. 44, no. 4, Aug. 2009, pp. 1406–23. Epmc, doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00974.x.
Pyne JM, Fortney JC, Tripathi S, Feeny D, Ubel P, Brazier J. How bad is depression? Preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population. Health services research. 2009 Aug;44(4):1406–1423.
Journal cover image

Published In

Health services research

DOI

EISSN

1475-6773

ISSN

0017-9124

Publication Date

August 2009

Volume

44

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1406 / 1423

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Sex Distribution
  • Reference Values
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Female
  • Depression