Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Zikmund-Fisher, BJ; Fagerlin, A; Keeton, K; Ubel, PA
Published in: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
November 2007

We tested whether adding interpretive labels (eg, "negative test") to prenatal genetic screening test results changes perceived risk and preferences for amniocentesis.Women (N = 1688) completed a hypothetical pregnancy scenario on the Internet. We randomly assigned participants into 2 groups: high risk of fetal chromosomal problems (12.5/1000) or low risk (2/1000). After prenatal screening, estimated risk was identical (5/1000) for all participants, but results were provided either alone or with interpretive labels.When receiving test results without labels, all participants react similarly. With labels, the participants who received "positive" or "abnormal" results reported a higher perceived risk (P < .001), greater worry (P < .001), and greater interest in amniocentesis (57% vs 37%; P < .001) than did the participants who received "negative" or "normal" results.Interpretive labels for test results can induce larger changes to a woman's risk perception and behavioral intention than can numeric results alone, which create decision momentum. This finding has broad clinical implications for patient-provider communication.

Duke Scholars

Published In

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

DOI

EISSN

1097-6868

ISSN

0002-9378

Publication Date

November 2007

Volume

197

Issue

5

Start / End Page

528.e1 / 528.e6

Related Subject Headings

  • Terminology as Topic
  • Risk Assessment
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Decision Making
  • Communication
  • Amniocentesis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Fagerlin, A., Keeton, K., & Ubel, P. A. (2007). Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 197(5), 528.e1-528.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.076
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J., Angela Fagerlin, Kristie Keeton, and Peter A. Ubel. “Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197, no. 5 (November 2007): 528.e1-528.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.076.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Keeton K, Ubel PA. Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2007 Nov;197(5):528.e1-528.e6.
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J., et al. “Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 197, no. 5, Nov. 2007, pp. 528.e1-528.e6. Epmc, doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.076.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Keeton K, Ubel PA. Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2007 Nov;197(5):528.e1-528.e6.
Journal cover image

Published In

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

DOI

EISSN

1097-6868

ISSN

0002-9378

Publication Date

November 2007

Volume

197

Issue

5

Start / End Page

528.e1 / 528.e6

Related Subject Headings

  • Terminology as Topic
  • Risk Assessment
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Decision Making
  • Communication
  • Amniocentesis