Skip to main content

Physicians, thou shalt ration: the necessary role of bedside rationing in controlling healthcare costs.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ubel, PA
Published in: HealthcarePapers
January 2001

Physicians are often asked to be "gatekeepers," determining their patients' access to medical therapies and technologies. At the same time, most physicians have been taught that they should act as patient advocates, pursuing patients' best interests regardless of cost. This paper reviews moral arguments ethicists have made for and against "bedside rationing." It argues that healthcare rationing is appropriate in order to help control healthcare costs, and that rationing decisions made at the bedside by physicians must be part of the rationing system. A system that attempts to control costs by mandating an elaborate set of rules would be burdensome, and many physicians would find ways

Duke Scholars

Published In

HealthcarePapers

DOI

EISSN

1929-6339

ISSN

1488-917X

Publication Date

January 2001

Volume

2

Issue

2

Start / End Page

10 / 21

Related Subject Headings

  • Utilization Review
  • United States
  • Professional Autonomy
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Oregon
  • Morals
  • Humans
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Health Care Rationing
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ubel, P. A. (2001). Physicians, thou shalt ration: the necessary role of bedside rationing in controlling healthcare costs. HealthcarePapers, 2(2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2002.17453
Ubel, P. A. “Physicians, thou shalt ration: the necessary role of bedside rationing in controlling healthcare costs.HealthcarePapers 2, no. 2 (January 2001): 10–21. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2002.17453.
Ubel, P. A. “Physicians, thou shalt ration: the necessary role of bedside rationing in controlling healthcare costs.HealthcarePapers, vol. 2, no. 2, Jan. 2001, pp. 10–21. Epmc, doi:10.12927/hcpap.2002.17453.

Published In

HealthcarePapers

DOI

EISSN

1929-6339

ISSN

1488-917X

Publication Date

January 2001

Volume

2

Issue

2

Start / End Page

10 / 21

Related Subject Headings

  • Utilization Review
  • United States
  • Professional Autonomy
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Oregon
  • Morals
  • Humans
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Health Care Rationing