Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Brozek, JL; Akl, EA; Alonso-Coello, P; Lang, D; Jaeschke, R; Williams, JW; Phillips, B; Lelgemann, M; Lethaby, A; Bousquet, J; Guyatt, GH ...
Published in: Allergy
May 2009

The GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach provides guidance to grading the quality of underlying evidence and the strength of recommendations in health care. The GRADE system's conceptual underpinnings allow for a detailed stepwise process that defines what role the quality of the available evidence plays in the development of health care recommendations. The merit of GRADE is not that it eliminates judgments or disagreements about evidence and recommendations, but rather that it makes them transparent. This first article in a three-part series describes the GRADE framework in relation to grading the quality of evidence about interventions based on examples from the field of allergy and asthma. In the GRADE system, the quality of evidence reflects the extent to which a guideline panel's confidence in an estimate of the effect is adequate to support a particular recommendation. The system classifies quality of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low according to factors that include the study methodology, consistency and precision of the results, and directness of the evidence.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Allergy

DOI

EISSN

1398-9995

Publication Date

May 2009

Volume

64

Issue

5

Start / End Page

669 / 677

Location

Denmark

Related Subject Headings

  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Humans
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Allergy
  • 3204 Immunology
  • 1107 Immunology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brozek, J. L., Akl, E. A., Alonso-Coello, P., Lang, D., Jaeschke, R., Williams, J. W., … GRADE Working Group, . (2009). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy, 64(5), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x
Brozek, J. L., E. A. Akl, P. Alonso-Coello, D. Lang, R. Jaeschke, J. W. Williams, B. Phillips, et al. “Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.Allergy 64, no. 5 (May 2009): 669–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x.
Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Lang D, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Phillips B, Lelgemann M, Lethaby A, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy. 2009 May;64(5):669–677.
Journal cover image

Published In

Allergy

DOI

EISSN

1398-9995

Publication Date

May 2009

Volume

64

Issue

5

Start / End Page

669 / 677

Location

Denmark

Related Subject Headings

  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Humans
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Allergy
  • 3204 Immunology
  • 1107 Immunology