Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Total quality improvement in the IVF laboratory: choosing indicators of quality.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mayer, JF; Jones, EL; Dowling-Lacey, D; Nehchiri, F; Muasher, SJ; Gibbons, WE; Oehninger, SC
Published in: Reprod Biomed Online
December 2003

The purpose of this paper is to describe a programme of total quality improvement (TQI) within the IVF laboratory and to provide specific examples of indicators that could be used in such a TQI programme. Although TQI is sometimes confused with quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA), there are major differences between the three quality plans: (i) QC is an activity designed to ensure that a specific element within the laboratory is functioning correctly; (ii) QA is a comprehensive programme designed to looks at a laboratory as a whole and to identify problems or errors that exist in an attempt to improve the entire process; (iii) TQI is also a comprehensive monitoring process designed not only to detect and eliminate problems, but also to enhance a laboratory's performance by exploring innovation and developing flexibility and effectiveness in all processes. Indicators used in a TQI plan should be objective, relevant to the laboratory, and measure a broad range of specific events or aspects of treatment that reflect the quality of care. Threshold values for each of the indicators should be based on how the specific protocols used in the laboratory impact the outcomes and the nature of the indicators on quality of care.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Reprod Biomed Online

DOI

ISSN

1472-6483

Publication Date

December 2003

Volume

7

Issue

6

Start / End Page

695 / 699

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Quality Control
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Laboratories
  • Humans
  • Fertilization in Vitro
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
  • 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mayer, J. F., Jones, E. L., Dowling-Lacey, D., Nehchiri, F., Muasher, S. J., Gibbons, W. E., & Oehninger, S. C. (2003). Total quality improvement in the IVF laboratory: choosing indicators of quality. Reprod Biomed Online, 7(6), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62093-7
Mayer, Jacob F., Estella Lynn Jones, Donna Dowling-Lacey, Fariba Nehchiri, Suheil J. Muasher, William E. Gibbons, and Sergio C. Oehninger. “Total quality improvement in the IVF laboratory: choosing indicators of quality.Reprod Biomed Online 7, no. 6 (December 2003): 695–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62093-7.
Mayer JF, Jones EL, Dowling-Lacey D, Nehchiri F, Muasher SJ, Gibbons WE, et al. Total quality improvement in the IVF laboratory: choosing indicators of quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Dec;7(6):695–9.
Mayer, Jacob F., et al. “Total quality improvement in the IVF laboratory: choosing indicators of quality.Reprod Biomed Online, vol. 7, no. 6, Dec. 2003, pp. 695–99. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62093-7.
Mayer JF, Jones EL, Dowling-Lacey D, Nehchiri F, Muasher SJ, Gibbons WE, Oehninger SC. Total quality improvement in the IVF laboratory: choosing indicators of quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Dec;7(6):695–699.
Journal cover image

Published In

Reprod Biomed Online

DOI

ISSN

1472-6483

Publication Date

December 2003

Volume

7

Issue

6

Start / End Page

695 / 699

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Quality Control
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Laboratories
  • Humans
  • Fertilization in Vitro
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
  • 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine