Scholars@Duke
Journal cover image

Response to the 'Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care'.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hauerwas, S
Published in: Christian bioethics
August 2001
Published version (DOI)

Duke Scholars

Stanley M. Hauerwas
Author Stanley M. Hauerwas Divinity School

Published In

Christian bioethics

DOI

10.1076/chbi.7.2.239.3749

EISSN

1744-4195

ISSN

1380-3603

Publication Date

August 2001

Volume

7

Issue

2

Start / End Page

239 / 242

Related Subject Headings

  • Theology
  • Social Justice
  • Resource Allocation
  • Life Support Care
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Humans
  • Hospitals, Religious
  • Health Care Rationing
  • Guidelines as Topic
  • Critical Care
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hauerwas, S. (2001). Response to the 'Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care'. Christian Bioethics, 7(2), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1076/chbi.7.2.239.3749
Hauerwas, S. “Response to the 'Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care'.” Christian Bioethics 7, no. 2 (August 2001): 239–42. https://doi.org/10.1076/chbi.7.2.239.3749.
Hauerwas, S. “Response to the 'Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care'.” Christian Bioethics, vol. 7, no. 2, Aug. 2001, pp. 239–42. Epmc, doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.239.3749.
Journal cover image

Published In

Christian bioethics

DOI

10.1076/chbi.7.2.239.3749

EISSN

1744-4195

ISSN

1380-3603

Publication Date

August 2001

Volume

7

Issue

2

Start / End Page

239 / 242

Related Subject Headings

  • Theology
  • Social Justice
  • Resource Allocation
  • Life Support Care
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Humans
  • Hospitals, Religious
  • Health Care Rationing
  • Guidelines as Topic
  • Critical Care