What is the best measure for rewarding quality of care: Defect-free vs. composite scoring? An analysis from the American heart association's get with the guidelines-coronary artery disease (GWTG-CAD) program?
Publication
, Conference
Hernandez, AF; Fonarow, GC; Dai, D; O'Brien, SM; LaBresh, KA; Schwamm, LH; Cannon, CP
Published in: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
March 6, 2007
Duke Scholars
Published In
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN
0735-1097
Publication Date
March 6, 2007
Volume
49
Issue
9
Start / End Page
291A / 291A
Location
New Orleans, LA
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Conference Name
56th Annual Scientific Session of the American-College-of-Cardiology
Related Subject Headings
- Cardiovascular System & Hematology
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
- 1117 Public Health and Health Services
- 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hernandez, A. F., Fonarow, G. C., Dai, D., O’Brien, S. M., LaBresh, K. A., Schwamm, L. H., & Cannon, C. P. (2007). What is the best measure for rewarding quality of care: Defect-free vs. composite scoring? An analysis from the American heart association's get with the guidelines-coronary artery disease (GWTG-CAD) program? In JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (Vol. 49, pp. 291A-291A). New Orleans, LA: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC.
Hernandez, Adrian F., Gregg C. Fonarow, Dadi Dai, Sean M. O’Brien, Kenneth A. LaBresh, Lee H. Schwamm, and Christopher P. Cannon. “What is the best measure for rewarding quality of care: Defect-free vs. composite scoring? An analysis from the American heart association's get with the guidelines-coronary artery disease (GWTG-CAD) program?” In JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 49:291A-291A. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2007.
Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Dai D, O’Brien SM, LaBresh KA, Schwamm LH, et al. What is the best measure for rewarding quality of care: Defect-free vs. composite scoring? An analysis from the American heart association's get with the guidelines-coronary artery disease (GWTG-CAD) program? In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC; 2007. p. 291A-291A.
Hernandez, Adrian F., et al. “What is the best measure for rewarding quality of care: Defect-free vs. composite scoring? An analysis from the American heart association's get with the guidelines-coronary artery disease (GWTG-CAD) program?” JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, vol. 49, no. 9, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2007, pp. 291A-291A.
Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Dai D, O’Brien SM, LaBresh KA, Schwamm LH, Cannon CP. What is the best measure for rewarding quality of care: Defect-free vs. composite scoring? An analysis from the American heart association's get with the guidelines-coronary artery disease (GWTG-CAD) program? JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC; 2007. p. 291A-291A.
Published In
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN
0735-1097
Publication Date
March 6, 2007
Volume
49
Issue
9
Start / End Page
291A / 291A
Location
New Orleans, LA
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Conference Name
56th Annual Scientific Session of the American-College-of-Cardiology
Related Subject Headings
- Cardiovascular System & Hematology
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
- 1117 Public Health and Health Services
- 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology