Skip to main content

DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION

Publication ,  Journal Article
ROWE, TD
Published in: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW
March 1, 1993

Duke Scholars

Published In

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW

ISSN

0041-9915

Publication Date

March 1, 1993

Volume

54

Issue

3

Start / End Page

795 / 803

Publisher

UNIV PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW

Related Subject Headings

  • Law
  • 48 Law and legal studies
  • 1801 Law
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
ROWE, T. D. (1993). DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, 54(3), 795–803.
ROWE, T. D. “DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION.” UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 54, no. 3 (March 1, 1993): 795–803.
ROWE TD. DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW. 1993 Mar 1;54(3):795–803.
ROWE, T. D. “DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION.” UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, vol. 54, no. 3, UNIV PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, Mar. 1993, pp. 795–803.
ROWE TD. DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW. UNIV PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW; 1993 Mar 1;54(3):795–803.

Published In

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW

ISSN

0041-9915

Publication Date

March 1, 1993

Volume

54

Issue

3

Start / End Page

795 / 803

Publisher

UNIV PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW

Related Subject Headings

  • Law
  • 48 Law and legal studies
  • 1801 Law