DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION
Publication
, Journal Article
ROWE, TD
Published in: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW
March 1, 1993
Duke Scholars
Published In
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW
ISSN
0041-9915
Publication Date
March 1, 1993
Volume
54
Issue
3
Start / End Page
795 / 803
Publisher
UNIV PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW
Related Subject Headings
- Law
- 48 Law and legal studies
- 1801 Law
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
ROWE, T. D. (1993). DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, 54(3), 795–803.
ROWE, T. D. “DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION.” UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 54, no. 3 (March 1, 1993): 795–803.
ROWE TD. DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW. 1993 Mar 1;54(3):795–803.
ROWE, T. D. “DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION.” UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, vol. 54, no. 3, UNIV PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, Mar. 1993, pp. 795–803.
ROWE TD. DEFINING FINALITY AND APPEALABILITY BY COURT RULE - A COMMENT ON MARTINEAU RIGHT PROBLEM, WRONG SOLUTION. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW. UNIV PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW; 1993 Mar 1;54(3):795–803.
Published In
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW
ISSN
0041-9915
Publication Date
March 1, 1993
Volume
54
Issue
3
Start / End Page
795 / 803
Publisher
UNIV PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW
Related Subject Headings
- Law
- 48 Law and legal studies
- 1801 Law