Duration of empirical antibiotic therapy for infants suspected of early-onset sepsis.

Published

Journal Article (Review)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Clinicians' adherence to the Centers for Disease Control guidelines to prevent group B Streptococcus (GBS) early-onset sepsis (EOS) has reduced GBS EOS. Although evidence-based testing and empirical antibiotic initiation are likely saving lives, clinicians have less compelling data to guide duration of empirically initiated antibiotics when cultures remain sterile and clinical signs resolve quickly. Our purpose is to review current opinions and evidence influencing clinicians' choices for duration of empirically initiated antibiotics in newborns with sterile cultures. RECENT FINDINGS: Retrospective cohort studies indicate potential for harm with longer duration of empirical antibiotics for EOS when cultures are sterile. Cohort studies indicate timing of widely used tests used to estimate EOS risk affects their predictive value, and tests acquired 24-48 h postnatally may provide reassurance for safe discontinuation. SUMMARY: Every day clinicians caring for thousands of neonates in the United States stop antibiotics which were started empirically to treat EOS on the first postnatal day. Evidence is lacking to support a universal approach to decisions on duration of empirical antibiotics when cultures remain sterile. Reviewing predictive value relative to timing of laboratory testing can help clinicians develop locally appropriate antimicrobial duration decision-making guidelines.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Cotten, CM; Smith, PB

Published Date

  • April 2013

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 25 / 2

Start / End Page

  • 167 - 171

PubMed ID

  • 23407181

Pubmed Central ID

  • 23407181

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1531-698X

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835e01f6

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States