Skip to main content

Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Brennan, JM; Edwards, FH; Zhao, Y; O'Brien, S; Booth, ME; Dokholyan, RS; Douglas, PS; Peterson, ED ...
Published in: Circulation
April 23, 2013

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of long-term data comparing biological versus mechanical aortic valve prostheses in older individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed follow-up of patients aged 65 to 80 years undergoing aortic valve replacement with a biological (n=24 410) or mechanical (n=14 789) prosthesis from 1991 to 1999 at 605 centers within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database using Medicare inpatient claims (mean, 12.6 years; maximum, 17 years; minimum, 8 years), and outcomes were compared by propensity methods. Among Medicare-linked patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (mean age, 73 years), both reoperation (4.0%) and endocarditis (1.9%) were uncommon to 12 years; however, the risk for other adverse outcomes was high, including death (66.5%), stroke (14.1%), and bleeding (17.9%). Compared with those receiving a mechanical valve, patients given a bioprosthesis had a similar adjusted risk for death (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07), higher risks for reoperation (hazard ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.14-3.03) and endocarditis (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.94), and lower risks for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) and bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.70). Although these results were generally consistent among patient subgroups, bioprosthesis patients aged 65 to 69 years had a substantially elevated 12-year absolute risk of reoperation (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, long-term mortality rates were similar for those who received bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves. Bioprostheses were associated with a higher long-term risk of reoperation and endocarditis but a lower risk of stroke and hemorrhage. These risks varied as a function of a patient's age and comorbidities.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

April 23, 2013

Volume

127

Issue

16

Start / End Page

1647 / 1655

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Stroke
  • Societies, Medical
  • Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reoperation
  • Prognosis
  • Postoperative Complications
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brennan, J. M., Edwards, F. H., Zhao, Y., O’Brien, S., Booth, M. E., Dokholyan, R. S., … DEcIDE AVR (Developing Evidence to Inform Decisions about Effectiveness–Aortic Valve Replacement) Research Team, . (2013). Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database. Circulation, 127(16), 1647–1655. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002003
Brennan, J Matthew, Fred H. Edwards, Yue Zhao, Sean O’Brien, Michael E. Booth, Rachel S. Dokholyan, Pamela S. Douglas, Eric D. Peterson, and Eric D. DEcIDE AVR (Developing Evidence to Inform Decisions about Effectiveness–Aortic Valve Replacement) Research Team. “Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database.Circulation 127, no. 16 (April 23, 2013): 1647–55. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002003.
Brennan, J. Matthew, et al. “Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database.Circulation, vol. 127, no. 16, Apr. 2013, pp. 1647–55. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002003.
Brennan JM, Edwards FH, Zhao Y, O’Brien S, Booth ME, Dokholyan RS, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, DEcIDE AVR (Developing Evidence to Inform Decisions about Effectiveness–Aortic Valve Replacement) Research Team. Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database. Circulation. 2013 Apr 23;127(16):1647–1655.

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

April 23, 2013

Volume

127

Issue

16

Start / End Page

1647 / 1655

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Stroke
  • Societies, Medical
  • Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reoperation
  • Prognosis
  • Postoperative Complications