Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Clinical evaluation of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Brazg, R; Hughes, K; Martin, P; Coard, J; Toffaletti, J; McDonnell, E; Taylor, E; Farrell, L; Patel, M; Ward, J; Chen, T; Alva, S; Ng, R
Published in: Clin Chim Acta
June 5, 2013

BACKGROUND: A new version of international standard (ISO 15197) and CLSI Guideline (POCT12) with more stringent accuracy criteria are near publication. We evaluated the glucose test performance of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system, a new blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) designed to enhance accuracy for point-of-care testing (POCT). METHODS: Precision, interference and system accuracy with 503 blood samples from capillary, venous and arterial sources were evaluated in a multicenter study. Study results were analyzed and presented in accordance with the specifications and recommendations of the final draft ISO 15197 and the new POCT12. RESULTS: The FreeStyle Precision Pro system demonstrated acceptable precision (CV <5%), no interference across a hematocrit range of 15-65%, and, except for xylose, no interference from 24 of 25 potentially interfering substances. It also met all accuracy criteria specified in the final draft ISO 15197 and POCT12, with 97.3-98.9% of the individual results of various blood sample types agreeing within ±12 mg/dl of the laboratory analyzer values at glucose concentrations <100mg/dl and within ±12.5% of the laboratory analyzer values at glucose concentrations ≥100 mg/dl. CONCLUSIONS: The FreeStyle Precision Pro system met the tighter accuracy requirements, providing a means for enhancing accuracy for point-of-care blood glucose monitoring.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clin Chim Acta

DOI

EISSN

1873-3492

Publication Date

June 5, 2013

Volume

421

Start / End Page

243 / 250

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reference Values
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Point-of-Care Systems
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Humans
  • Hematocrit
  • General Clinical Medicine
  • Blood Glucose
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brazg, R., Hughes, K., Martin, P., Coard, J., Toffaletti, J., McDonnell, E., … Ng, R. (2013). Clinical evaluation of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system. Clin Chim Acta, 421, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.021
Brazg, Ronald, Kristen Hughes, Pamela Martin, Julie Coard, John Toffaletti, Elizabeth McDonnell, Elizabeth Taylor, et al. “Clinical evaluation of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system.Clin Chim Acta 421 (June 5, 2013): 243–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.021.
Brazg R, Hughes K, Martin P, Coard J, Toffaletti J, McDonnell E, et al. Clinical evaluation of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system. Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Jun 5;421:243–50.
Brazg, Ronald, et al. “Clinical evaluation of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system.Clin Chim Acta, vol. 421, June 2013, pp. 243–50. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.021.
Brazg R, Hughes K, Martin P, Coard J, Toffaletti J, McDonnell E, Taylor E, Farrell L, Patel M, Ward J, Chen T, Alva S, Ng R. Clinical evaluation of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system. Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Jun 5;421:243–250.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Chim Acta

DOI

EISSN

1873-3492

Publication Date

June 5, 2013

Volume

421

Start / End Page

243 / 250

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reference Values
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Point-of-Care Systems
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Humans
  • Hematocrit
  • General Clinical Medicine
  • Blood Glucose