Clinical outcomes of remission induction therapy for severe antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.

Journal Article (Clinical Trial;Journal Article)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reasons that complete remission is not achieved or maintained with original treatment in some patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) treated with rituximab (RTX) or with cyclophosphamide/azathioprine (CYC/AZA). METHODS: The Rituximab in AAV trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the rate of remission induction among patients treated with RTX (n = 99) and patients treated with CYC followed by AZA (n = 98). Glucocorticoids were tapered over a period of 5 months. The primary outcome measure was lack of disease activity without glucocorticoid treatment at 6 months. To determine the most important reason for failure to achieve the primary outcome, 7 hierarchical categories of reasons were defined retrospectively (uncontrolled disease, adverse event leading to therapy discontinuation, severe flare, limited flare, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis >0, prednisone treatment at any dosage, and other). RESULTS: Although remission (lack of disease activity) was achieved in 170 of the 197 patients (86%) in the first 6 months, the primary outcome measure was not achieved in 42%. There were 3 deaths. Twenty-four percent of the patients failed to achieve the primary end point due to active disease: 10 (5%) experienced uncontrolled disease in the first month and 37 (19%) experienced flares after initial improvement. In the majority of such patients, treatment with blinded crossover or according to best medical judgment led to disease control. Ninety-one percent of patients who had uncontrolled disease or experienced a severe flare had proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA. When patients with uncontrolled disease were excluded from analysis, those who were PR3-ANCA positive were found to experience fewer flares when treated with RTX compared to CYC/AZA (8 of 59 [14%] versus 20 of 62 [32%]; P = 0.02). Neither ANCA titers nor B cell counts predicted disease flare. CONCLUSION: Current treatment regimens are largely successful in controlling AAV, but in approximately one-fourth of patients, active disease persists or recurs in the first 6 months despite treatment. PR3-ANCA positivity is a risk factor for recurrence or persistence of severe disease. ANCA titers and B cell detectability are poor predictors of both disease relapse and disease quiescence in the first 6 months.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Miloslavsky, EM; Specks, U; Merkel, PA; Seo, P; Spiera, R; Langford, CA; Hoffman, GS; Kallenberg, CGM; St Clair, EW; Tchao, NK; Viviano, L; Ding, L; Sejismundo, LP; Mieras, K; Iklé, D; Jepson, B; Mueller, M; Brunetta, P; Allen, NB; Fervenza, FC; Geetha, D; Keogh, K; Kissin, EY; Monach, PA; Peikert, T; Stegeman, C; Ytterberg, SR; Stone, JH; Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis-Immune Tolerance Network Research Group,

Published Date

  • September 2013

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 65 / 9

Start / End Page

  • 2441 - 2449

PubMed ID

  • 23754238

Pubmed Central ID

  • PMC4949954

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1529-0131

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/art.38044


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States