A test of different menu labeling presentations.

Published

Journal Article

Chain restaurants will soon need to disclose calorie information on menus, but research on the impact of calorie labels on food choices is mixed. This study tested whether calorie information presented in different formats influenced calories ordered and perceived restaurant healthfulness. Participants in an online survey were randomly assigned to a menu with either (1) no calorie labels (No Calories); (2) calorie labels (Calories); (3) calorie labels ordered from low to high calories (Rank-Ordered Calories); or (4) calorie labels ordered from low to high calories that also had red/green circles indicating higher and lower calorie choices (Colored Calories). Participants ordered items for dinner, estimated calories ordered, and rated restaurant healthfulness. Participants in the Rank-Ordered Calories condition and those in the Colored Calories condition ordered fewer calories than the No Calories group. There was no significant difference in calories ordered between the Calories and No Calories groups. Participants in each calorie label condition were significantly more accurate in estimating calories ordered compared to the No Calories group. Those in the Colored Calories group perceived the restaurant as healthier. The results suggest that presenting calorie information in the modified Rank-Ordered or Colored Calories formats may increase menu labeling effectiveness.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Liu, PJ; Roberto, CA; Liu, LJ; Brownell, KD

Published Date

  • December 2012

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 59 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 770 - 777

PubMed ID

  • 22918176

Pubmed Central ID

  • 22918176

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1095-8304

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0195-6663

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.011

Language

  • eng