Does the gats undermine democratic control over health?

Published

Journal Article

This paper examines the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), which is one of the World Trade Organisation's free trade agreements. In particular, I examine the extent to which the GATS unduly restricts the scope for national democratic choice. For purposes of illustration, I focus on the domestic health system as the subject of policy choice. I argue that signatories to the GATS effectively acquire a constitutional obligation to maintain a domestic health sector with a certain minimum degree of privatisation. Like constitutional obligations, the restrictions the GATS imposes on the freedom of future generations to structure their domestic health sector are (i) very difficult, though not strictly impossible, to alter; and (ii) not chosen in any ordinary sense by the subject generation. To gain democratic legitimacy, therefore, the relevant provisions of the GATS must pass some higher standard of democratic scrutiny, such as ratification by a supermajority. Ordinary legislative ratification does not suffice. © Springer 2005.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Sreenivasan, G

Published Date

  • January 1, 2005

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 9 / 1-2

Start / End Page

  • 269 - 281

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1572-8609

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1382-4554

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1007/s10892-004-3329-4

Citation Source

  • Scopus