Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Influence of presenting electrocardiographic findings on the treatment and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Patel, JH; Gupta, R; Roe, MT; Peng, SA; Wiviott, SD; Saucedo, JF
Published in: Am J Cardiol
January 15, 2014

The influence of the presenting electrocardiographic (ECG) findings on the treatment and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has not been studied in contemporary practice. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, in-hospital management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with NSTEMI in the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines (ACTION Registry-GWTG) according to the presenting ECG findings. A total of 175,556 patients from 485 sites from January 2007 to September 2011 were stratified by the ECG findings on presentation: ST depression (n = 40,146, 22.9%), T-wave inversions (n = 24,627, 14%), transient ST-segment elevation (n = 5,050, 2.9%), and no ischemic changes (n = 105,733, 60.2%). Patients presenting with ST-segment depression were the oldest and had the greatest prevalence of major cardiac risk factors. Coronary angiography was performed most frequently in the transient ST-segment elevation group, followed by the T-wave inversion, ST-segment depression, and no ischemic changes groups. The angiogram revealed that patients with ST-segment depression had more left main, proximal left anterior descending, and 3-vessel coronary artery disease and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting most often. In contrast, patients with transient ST-segment elevation had 1-vessel CAD and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention the most. The unadjusted mortality was highest in the ST-segment depression group, followed by the no ischemic changes, transient ST-segment elevation, and T-wave inversion group. Adjusted mortality using the ACTION Registry-GWTG in-hospital mortality model with the no ischemic changes group as the reference showed that in-hospital mortality was similar in the transient ST-segment elevation (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 1.37; p = 0.10), higher in the ST-segment depression group (odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 1.54; p <0.0001), and lower in the T-wave inversion group (odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.99; p = 0.026). In conclusion, the clinical and angiographic characteristics and treatment and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI differed substantially according to the presenting ECG findings. Patients with ST-segment depression have a greater burden of co-morbidities and coronary atherosclerosis and have a greater risk of adjusted in-hospital mortality compared with the other groups. These findings highlight the importance of integrating the presenting ECG findings into the risk stratification algorithm for patients with NSTEMI.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1879-1913

Publication Date

January 15, 2014

Volume

113

Issue

2

Start / End Page

256 / 261

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Time Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Odds Ratio
  • Myocardial Infarction
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Patel, J. H., Gupta, R., Roe, M. T., Peng, S. A., Wiviott, S. D., & Saucedo, J. F. (2014). Influence of presenting electrocardiographic findings on the treatment and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol, 113(2), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.009
Patel, Jigar H., Raghav Gupta, Matthew T. Roe, S Andrew Peng, Stephen D. Wiviott, and Jorge F. Saucedo. “Influence of presenting electrocardiographic findings on the treatment and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol 113, no. 2 (January 15, 2014): 256–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.009.
Patel JH, Gupta R, Roe MT, Peng SA, Wiviott SD, Saucedo JF. Influence of presenting electrocardiographic findings on the treatment and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;113(2):256–61.
Patel, Jigar H., et al. “Influence of presenting electrocardiographic findings on the treatment and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol, vol. 113, no. 2, Jan. 2014, pp. 256–61. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.009.
Patel JH, Gupta R, Roe MT, Peng SA, Wiviott SD, Saucedo JF. Influence of presenting electrocardiographic findings on the treatment and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;113(2):256–261.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1879-1913

Publication Date

January 15, 2014

Volume

113

Issue

2

Start / End Page

256 / 261

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Time Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Odds Ratio
  • Myocardial Infarction