Skip to main content

Radiation risk from medical imaging in children

Publication ,  Journal Article
Frush, DP; Applegate, KE
December 1, 2010

Key Points: □ Medical radiation currently accounts for an increasing percentage (approximately 50%) of the total radiation exposure for the US population (previously about 15%) (moderate evidence). □ Children are 2-5 (some cite up to 10) times more sensitive to radiation than adults (moderate evidence). □ There are no data that prove a direct link between low-level radiation from diagnostic imaging and cancer. The best data regarding long-term effects of low-level radiation (100-150 mSv) exposure come from the longitudinal survivor study (LSS) of atomic bomb survivors (moderate evidence). □ Most major medical and scientific organizations accept the linear, no-threshold model as the preferred model for low-level radiation and cancer risk estimation. □ The lifetime risk of fatal cancer from a single (relatively high dose) CT in a child has been estimated to be 1:1000 (limited to moderate evidence). © 2010 Springer-Verlag New York.

Duke Scholars

DOI

Publication Date

December 1, 2010

Start / End Page

25 / 39
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Frush, D. P., & Applegate, K. E. (2010). Radiation risk from medical imaging in children, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0922-0_3
Frush, D. P., and K. E. Applegate. “Radiation risk from medical imaging in children,” December 1, 2010, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0922-0_3.
Frush DP, Applegate KE. Radiation risk from medical imaging in children. 2010 Dec 1;25–39.
Frush, D. P., and K. E. Applegate. Radiation risk from medical imaging in children. Dec. 2010, pp. 25–39. Scopus, doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0922-0_3.
Frush DP, Applegate KE. Radiation risk from medical imaging in children. 2010 Dec 1;25–39.

DOI

Publication Date

December 1, 2010

Start / End Page

25 / 39