Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Nutrient flux, uptake, and autotrophic limitation in streams and rivers

Publication ,  Journal Article
King, SA; Heffernan, JB; Cohen, MJ
Published in: Freshwater Science
January 1, 2014

Assessments of biotic nutrient limitation in aquatic ecosystems typically rely on concentrations and ratios of potentially limiting nutrients. While successful in lakes, this approach has been less effective in streams, which often are dominated by benthic autotrophs (e.g., algae and vascular plants). We compared water-column nutrient concentration (C) to 3 alternative metrics and assessed their ability to predict autotrophic nutrient limitation in streams. One metric, nutrient flux (F) is the product of nutrient concentration and stream discharge. The other 2 metrics, autotrophic uptake length (Sw,a) and autotrophic uptake velocity (Vf,a), are derived from nutrient-spiraling theory and incorporate nutrient uptake. To evaluate the ability of each metric to predict nutrient limitation, we analyzed nutrient diffusing substrata (NDS) data from the Lotic Intersite Nitrogen eXperiment (LINX) (phases I and II; n = 80 streams across North America). We calculated NDS response ratios (RRs) to quantify the strength of autotrophic nutrient limitation in each stream, and we regressed RRs against each of the 4 metrics for N and P. For the LINX I analysis, Sw,a was the best predictor of autotrophic N limitation. F and Vf,a also performed well, and C was a poor predictor. In contrast, all 4 metrics were poor predictors of N limitation for the LINX II analysis when evaluated for individual streams, by land use, and within regions. None of the metrics were able to predict P limitation for either LINX study. Accuracy could be enhanced by developing new methods to quantify autotrophic nutrient uptake and limitation in stream reaches, but consistency with nutrient-spiraling theory and improved predictability of autotrophic N limitation make Sw,a a potentially useful metric for evaluating N limitation in streams. © 2014 by The Society for Freshwater Science.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Freshwater Science

DOI

EISSN

2161-9565

ISSN

2161-9549

Publication Date

January 1, 2014

Volume

33

Issue

1

Start / End Page

85 / 98

Related Subject Headings

  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0699 Other Biological Sciences
  • 0602 Ecology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
King, S. A., Heffernan, J. B., & Cohen, M. J. (2014). Nutrient flux, uptake, and autotrophic limitation in streams and rivers. Freshwater Science, 33(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/674383
King, S. A., J. B. Heffernan, and M. J. Cohen. “Nutrient flux, uptake, and autotrophic limitation in streams and rivers.” Freshwater Science 33, no. 1 (January 1, 2014): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/674383.
King SA, Heffernan JB, Cohen MJ. Nutrient flux, uptake, and autotrophic limitation in streams and rivers. Freshwater Science. 2014 Jan 1;33(1):85–98.
King, S. A., et al. “Nutrient flux, uptake, and autotrophic limitation in streams and rivers.” Freshwater Science, vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 85–98. Scopus, doi:10.1086/674383.
King SA, Heffernan JB, Cohen MJ. Nutrient flux, uptake, and autotrophic limitation in streams and rivers. Freshwater Science. 2014 Jan 1;33(1):85–98.
Journal cover image

Published In

Freshwater Science

DOI

EISSN

2161-9565

ISSN

2161-9549

Publication Date

January 1, 2014

Volume

33

Issue

1

Start / End Page

85 / 98

Related Subject Headings

  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0699 Other Biological Sciences
  • 0602 Ecology