Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths
Publication
, Journal Article
Vidmar, N
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
2009
Duke Scholars
Published In
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
Publication Date
2009
Volume
467
Start / End Page
367 / 375
Related Subject Headings
- United States
- Physicians
- Orthopedics
- Negotiating
- Malpractice
- Insurance, Liability
- Humans
- Decision Making
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Vidmar, N. (2009). Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 467, 367–375.
Vidmar, N. “Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths.” Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 467 (2009): 367–75.
Vidmar N. Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2009;467:367–75.
Vidmar, N. “Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths.” Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, vol. 467, 2009, pp. 367–75.
Vidmar N. Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2009;467:367–375.
Published In
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
Publication Date
2009
Volume
467
Start / End Page
367 / 375
Related Subject Headings
- United States
- Physicians
- Orthopedics
- Negotiating
- Malpractice
- Insurance, Liability
- Humans
- Decision Making
- 1103 Clinical Sciences