Skip to main content

Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths

Publication ,  Journal Article
Vidmar, N
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
2009

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research

Publication Date

2009

Volume

467

Start / End Page

367 / 375

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Physicians
  • Orthopedics
  • Negotiating
  • Malpractice
  • Insurance, Liability
  • Humans
  • Decision Making
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Vidmar, N. (2009). Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 467, 367–375.
Vidmar, N. “Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths.” Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 467 (2009): 367–75.
Vidmar N. Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2009;467:367–75.
Vidmar, N. “Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths.” Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, vol. 467, 2009, pp. 367–75.
Vidmar N. Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2009;467:367–375.

Published In

Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research

Publication Date

2009

Volume

467

Start / End Page

367 / 375

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Physicians
  • Orthopedics
  • Negotiating
  • Malpractice
  • Insurance, Liability
  • Humans
  • Decision Making
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences