Scientific integrity--the cornerstone of knowledge
Publication
, Journal Article
Broome, ME
Published in: J Neurosci Nurs
2003
In the past, nurses often found themselves pressured within complex social interactions in the research environment that often overshadowed their advocacy role for the patient (Davis, 1989). With the recent emphasis on enforcing adequate protections for participants in research, nurses need to feel free to act as sentient beings with a conscience and a strong commitment to their patients. It is only through this advocacy role that scientific misconduct can be reduced and research integrity upheld.
Duke Scholars
Published In
J Neurosci Nurs
ISSN
0888-0395
Publication Date
2003
Volume
35
Start / End Page
56 / 59
Related Subject Headings
- Scientific Misconduct
- Humans
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Ethics, Nursing
- Education, Nursing, Continuing
- Clinical Nursing Research
- 4205 Nursing
- 3209 Neurosciences
- 1110 Nursing
- 1109 Neurosciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Broome, M. E. (2003). Scientific integrity--the cornerstone of knowledge. J Neurosci Nurs, 35, 56–59.
Broome, M. E. “Scientific integrity--the cornerstone of knowledge.” J Neurosci Nurs 35 (2003): 56–59.
Broome ME. Scientific integrity--the cornerstone of knowledge. J Neurosci Nurs. 2003;35:56–9.
Broome, M. E. “Scientific integrity--the cornerstone of knowledge.” J Neurosci Nurs, vol. 35, 2003, pp. 56–59.
Broome ME. Scientific integrity--the cornerstone of knowledge. J Neurosci Nurs. 2003;35:56–59.
Published In
J Neurosci Nurs
ISSN
0888-0395
Publication Date
2003
Volume
35
Start / End Page
56 / 59
Related Subject Headings
- Scientific Misconduct
- Humans
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Ethics, Nursing
- Education, Nursing, Continuing
- Clinical Nursing Research
- 4205 Nursing
- 3209 Neurosciences
- 1110 Nursing
- 1109 Neurosciences