Skip to main content

DNA methylation profiling in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study defines cancer subclasses differing in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Conway, K; Edmiston, SN; May, R; Kuan, PF; Chu, H; Bryant, C; Tse, C-K; Swift-Scanlan, T; Geradts, J; Troester, MA; Millikan, RC
Published in: Breast Cancer Res
October 7, 2014

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, with several intrinsic subtypes differing by hormone receptor (HR) status, molecular profiles, and prognosis. However, the role of DNA methylation in breast cancer development and progression and its relationship with the intrinsic tumor subtypes are not fully understood. METHODS: A microarray targeting promoters of cancer-related genes was used to evaluate DNA methylation at 935 CpG sites in 517 breast tumors from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, a population-based study of invasive breast cancer. RESULTS: Consensus clustering using methylation (β) values for the 167 most variant CpG loci defined four clusters differing most distinctly in HR status, intrinsic subtype (luminal versus basal-like), and p53 mutation status. Supervised analyses for HR status, subtype, and p53 status identified 266 differentially methylated CpG loci with considerable overlap. Genes relatively hypermethylated in HR+, luminal A, or p53 wild-type breast cancers included FABP3, FGF2, FZD9, GAS7, HDAC9, HOXA11, MME, PAX6, POMC, PTGS2, RASSF1, RBP1, and SCGB3A1, whereas those more highly methylated in HR-, basal-like, or p53 mutant tumors included BCR, C4B, DAB2IP, MEST, RARA, SEPT5, TFF1, THY1, and SERPINA5. Clustering also defined a hypermethylated luminal-enriched tumor cluster 3 that gene ontology analysis revealed to be enriched for homeobox and other developmental genes (ASCL2, DLK1, EYA4, GAS7, HOXA5, HOXA9, HOXB13, IHH, IPF1, ISL1, PAX6, TBX1, SOX1, and SOX17). Although basal-enriched cluster 2 showed worse short-term survival, the luminal-enriched cluster 3 showed worse long-term survival but was not independently prognostic in multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, likely due to the mostly early stage cases in this dataset. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that epigenetic patterns are strongly associated with HR status, subtype, and p53 mutation status and may show heterogeneity within tumor subclass. Among HR+ breast tumors, a subset exhibiting a gene signature characterized by hypermethylation of developmental genes and poorer clinicopathologic features may have prognostic value and requires further study. Genes differentially methylated between clinically important tumor subsets have roles in differentiation, development, and tumor growth and may be critical to establishing and maintaining tumor phenotypes and clinical outcomes.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Breast Cancer Res

DOI

EISSN

1465-542X

Publication Date

October 7, 2014

Volume

16

Issue

5

Start / End Page

450

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Promoter Regions, Genetic
  • Prognosis
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • North Carolina
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Multigene Family
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Conway, K., Edmiston, S. N., May, R., Kuan, P. F., Chu, H., Bryant, C., … Millikan, R. C. (2014). DNA methylation profiling in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study defines cancer subclasses differing in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival. Breast Cancer Res, 16(5), 450. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0450-6
Conway, Kathleen, Sharon N. Edmiston, Ryan May, Pei Fen Kuan, Haitao Chu, Christopher Bryant, Chiu-Kit Tse, et al. “DNA methylation profiling in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study defines cancer subclasses differing in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival.Breast Cancer Res 16, no. 5 (October 7, 2014): 450. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0450-6.
Conway K, Edmiston SN, May R, Kuan PF, Chu H, Bryant C, et al. DNA methylation profiling in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study defines cancer subclasses differing in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival. Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Oct 7;16(5):450.
Conway, Kathleen, et al. “DNA methylation profiling in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study defines cancer subclasses differing in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival.Breast Cancer Res, vol. 16, no. 5, Oct. 2014, p. 450. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/s13058-014-0450-6.
Conway K, Edmiston SN, May R, Kuan PF, Chu H, Bryant C, Tse C-K, Swift-Scanlan T, Geradts J, Troester MA, Millikan RC. DNA methylation profiling in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study defines cancer subclasses differing in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival. Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Oct 7;16(5):450.

Published In

Breast Cancer Res

DOI

EISSN

1465-542X

Publication Date

October 7, 2014

Volume

16

Issue

5

Start / End Page

450

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Promoter Regions, Genetic
  • Prognosis
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • North Carolina
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Multigene Family