Skip to main content

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute pancreatitis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Baker, ME; Nelson, RC; Rosen, MP; Blake, MA; Cash, BD; Hindman, NM; Kamel, IR; Kaur, H; Piorkowski, RJ; Qayyum, A; Yarmish, GM
Published in: Ultrasound Q
December 2014

The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The Atlanta Classification by the Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group recently modified the terminology for the clinical course and the morphologic changes identified on imaging, primarily contrast- enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The two distinct clinical courses of the disease are classified as (1) early phase, which lasts approximately 1 week, and (2) late phase, which starts after the first week and can last for months after the initial episode. The two, primary, morphologic changes are acute, interstitial edematous and necrotizing pancreatitis. Timing of imaging, primarily MDCT, is based on the clinical phases and is, therefore, important for these imaging guidelines. Ultrasound's role is to detect gallstones after the first episode. MDCT plays a primary role in the management of acutely ill patients, only after a minimum of 48-72 hours and generally after one week. MR plays a supplementary role to MDCT. Follow-up MDCT guides management and therapy: percutaneous aspiration of fluid collections and/or placement of large caliber catheters in infected necrosis.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ultrasound Q

DOI

EISSN

1536-0253

Publication Date

December 2014

Volume

30

Issue

4

Start / End Page

267 / 273

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Pancreatitis
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Multidetector Computed Tomography
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Image Enhancement
  • Humans
  • Acute Disease
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Baker, M. E., Nelson, R. C., Rosen, M. P., Blake, M. A., Cash, B. D., Hindman, N. M., … Yarmish, G. M. (2014). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute pancreatitis. Ultrasound Q, 30(4), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000099
Baker, Mark E., Rendon C. Nelson, Max P. Rosen, Michael A. Blake, Brooks D. Cash, Nicole M. Hindman, Ihab R. Kamel, et al. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute pancreatitis.Ultrasound Q 30, no. 4 (December 2014): 267–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000099.
Baker ME, Nelson RC, Rosen MP, Blake MA, Cash BD, Hindman NM, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute pancreatitis. Ultrasound Q. 2014 Dec;30(4):267–73.
Baker, Mark E., et al. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute pancreatitis.Ultrasound Q, vol. 30, no. 4, Dec. 2014, pp. 267–73. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000099.
Baker ME, Nelson RC, Rosen MP, Blake MA, Cash BD, Hindman NM, Kamel IR, Kaur H, Piorkowski RJ, Qayyum A, Yarmish GM. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute pancreatitis. Ultrasound Q. 2014 Dec;30(4):267–273.

Published In

Ultrasound Q

DOI

EISSN

1536-0253

Publication Date

December 2014

Volume

30

Issue

4

Start / End Page

267 / 273

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Pancreatitis
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Multidetector Computed Tomography
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Image Enhancement
  • Humans
  • Acute Disease
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine