Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip femoroacetabular impingement/labral tear: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Reiman, MP; Goode, AP; Cook, CE; Hölmich, P; Thorborg, K
Published in: Br J Sports Med
June 2015

BACKGROUND: Surgery for hip femoroacetabular impingement/acetabular labral tear (FAI/ALT) is exponentially increasing despite lacking investigation of the accuracy of various diagnostic measures. Useful clinical utility of these measures is necessary to support diagnostic imaging and subsequent surgical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: Summarise/evaluate the current diagnostic accuracy of various clinical tests germane to hip FAI/ALT pathology. METHODS: A computer-assisted literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases using keywords related to diagnostic accuracy of the hip joint, as well as the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the search and reporting phases of the study. Quality assessment of bias and applicability was conducted using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Random effects models were used to summarise sensitivities (SN), specificities (SP), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and respective confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The employed search strategy revealed 21 potential articles, with one demonstrating high quality. Nine articles qualified for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that flexion-adduction-internal rotation (pooled SN ranging from 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.97) to 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.00); DOR 5.71 (95% CI 0.84 to 38.86) to 7.82 (95% CI 1.06 to 57.84)) and flexion-internal rotation (pooled SN 0.96 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.99); DOR 8.36 (95% CI 0.41 to 171.3) tests possess only screening accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Few hip physical examination tests for diagnosing FAI/ALT have been investigated in enough studies of substantial quality to direct clinical decision-making. Further high-quality studies across a wider spectrum of hip pathology patients are recommended to discern the confirmed clinical utility of these tests. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO Registration # CRD42014010144.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Br J Sports Med

DOI

EISSN

1473-0480

Publication Date

June 2015

Volume

49

Issue

12

Start / End Page

811

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Sport Sciences
  • Rupture
  • Reference Standards
  • ROC Curve
  • Physical Examination
  • Lacerations
  • Humans
  • Femoracetabular Impingement
  • 5201 Applied and developmental psychology
  • 4207 Sports science and exercise
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Reiman, M. P., Goode, A. P., Cook, C. E., Hölmich, P., & Thorborg, K. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip femoroacetabular impingement/labral tear: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med, 49(12), 811. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094302
Reiman, M. P., A. P. Goode, C. E. Cook, P. Hölmich, and K. Thorborg. “Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip femoroacetabular impingement/labral tear: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Br J Sports Med 49, no. 12 (June 2015): 811. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094302.
Reiman, M. P., et al. “Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip femoroacetabular impingement/labral tear: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Br J Sports Med, vol. 49, no. 12, June 2015, p. 811. Pubmed, doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094302.

Published In

Br J Sports Med

DOI

EISSN

1473-0480

Publication Date

June 2015

Volume

49

Issue

12

Start / End Page

811

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Sport Sciences
  • Rupture
  • Reference Standards
  • ROC Curve
  • Physical Examination
  • Lacerations
  • Humans
  • Femoracetabular Impingement
  • 5201 Applied and developmental psychology
  • 4207 Sports science and exercise