Skip to main content
Journal cover image
The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights

From “human rights” to “life rights”

Publication ,  Chapter
Mignolo, WD
January 1, 2012

The limits of the “Declaration of Rights of Man and of the Citizen” and the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” The 500 years of “rights” (from Rights of the People, to the Rights of Man and of the Citizen to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) is a history entrenched in the imaginary of western modernity. It is, in other words, only half of the story. The other half is the history of coloniality, the darker side of modernity. I have made this argument elsewhere. Here I will focus on the future more than on the past. The strong thesis is that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was not only a Euro-American and North Atlantic invention, it was an invention to correct the errors and mistakes of a handful of Western European states and the United States. I quote: On September 28, 1948, Eleanor Roosevelt, former First Lady and delegate of the United Nations, delivered a speech entitled, “The Struggle for Human Rights.” This speech was delivered at the Sorbonne in Paris, to an audience of thousands of French citizens and delegates of the United Nations. “The Struggle for Human Rights” dealt with the struggle toward universal acceptance of human rights from those states that were considered, by the United Nations and Roosevelt, non-compliant. Those non-compliant states consisted of the USSR, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, Byelorussia, and other member states who had refused to accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, thus denying every human being fundamental rights and freedoms. This declaration was written with the intent to unify all nations through common terms and principles surrounding the issues of human rights and freedoms. Roosevelt felt that she must persuade those non-compliant countries to come to an understanding of the fundamental principles agreed upon by the United Nations through the means of establishing unification with her democratic audience.

Duke Scholars

DOI

ISBN

9781107027855

Publication Date

January 1, 2012

Start / End Page

161 / 180
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mignolo, W. D. (2012). From “human rights” to “life rights”. In The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights (pp. 161–180). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139227124.013
Mignolo, W. D. “From “human rights” to “life rights”.” In The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights, 161–80, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139227124.013.
Mignolo WD. From “human rights” to “life rights”. In: The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights. 2012. p. 161–80.
Mignolo, W. D. “From “human rights” to “life rights”.” The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights, 2012, pp. 161–80. Scopus, doi:10.1017/CBO9781139227124.013.
Mignolo WD. From “human rights” to “life rights”. The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights. 2012. p. 161–180.
Journal cover image

DOI

ISBN

9781107027855

Publication Date

January 1, 2012

Start / End Page

161 / 180