Klem, I., Heiberg, E., van Assche, L., Wagner, G., Parker, M., Kim, H. W., … Kim, R. (2015). Sources of variability in quantification of CMR infarct size and their impact on sample size calculations - reproducibility among three core laboratories (Accepted). Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P84

Klem, I., E. Heiberg, L. van Assche, G. Wagner, M. Parker, H. W. Kim, J. D. Grizzard, H. Arheden, and R. Kim. “Sources of variability in quantification of CMR infarct size and their impact on sample size calculations - reproducibility among three core laboratories (Accepted).” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, February 3, 2015, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P84.

Klem I, Heiberg E, van Assche L, Wagner G, Parker M, Kim HW, et al. Sources of variability in quantification of CMR infarct size and their impact on sample size calculations - reproducibility among three core laboratories (Accepted). Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2015 Feb 3;1–2.

Klem, I., et al. “Sources of variability in quantification of CMR infarct size and their impact on sample size calculations - reproducibility among three core laboratories (Accepted).” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Feb. 2015, pp. 1–2. Scopus, doi:10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P84.

Klem I, Heiberg E, van Assche L, Wagner G, Parker M, Kim HW, Grizzard JD, Arheden H, Kim R. Sources of variability in quantification of CMR infarct size and their impact on sample size calculations - reproducibility among three core laboratories (Accepted). Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2015 Feb 3;1–2.