Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results.

Publication ,  Conference
Starling, RC; Estep, JD; Horstmanshof, DA; Milano, CA; Stehlik, J; Shah, KB; Bruckner, BA; Lee, S; Long, JW; Selzman, CH; Kasirajan, V ...
Published in: JACC Heart Fail
July 2017

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to provide the pre-specified primary endpoint of the ROADMAP (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients) trial at 2 years. BACKGROUND: The ROADMAP trial was a prospective nonrandomized observational study of 200 patients (97 with a left ventricular assist device [LVAD], 103 on optimal medical management [OMM]) that showed that survival with improved functional status at 1 year was better with LVADs compared with OMM in a patient population of ambulatory New York Heart Association functional class IIIb/IV patients. METHODS: The primary composite endpoint was survival on original therapy with improvement in 6-min walk distance ≥75 m. RESULTS: Patients receiving LVAD versus OMM had lower baseline health-related quality of life, reduced Seattle Heart Failure Model 1-year survival (78% vs. 84%; p = 0.012), and were predominantly INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) profile 4 (65% vs. 34%; p < 0.001) versus profiles 5 to 7. More LVAD patients met the primary endpoint at 2 years: 30% LVAD versus 12% OMM (odds ratio: 3.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 7.7]; p = 0.012). Survival as treated on original therapy at 2 years was greater for LVAD versus OMM (70 ± 5% vs. 41 ± 5%; p < 0.001), but there was no difference in intent-to-treat survival (70 ± 5% vs. 63 ± 5%; p = 0.307). In the OMM arm, 23 of 103 (22%) received delayed LVADs (18 within 12 months; 5 from 12 to 24 months). LVAD adverse events declined after year 1 for bleeding (primarily gastrointestinal) and arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Survival on original therapy with improvement in 6-min walk distance was superior with LVAD compared with OMM at 2 years. Reduction in key adverse events beyond 1 year was observed in the LVAD group. The ROADMAP trial provides risk-benefit information to guide patient- and physician-shared decision making for elective LVAD therapy as a treatment for heart failure. (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients [ROADMAP]; NCT01452802).

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

JACC Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

2213-1787

Publication Date

July 2017

Volume

5

Issue

7

Start / End Page

518 / 527

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Assessment
  • Quality of Life
  • Prospective Studies
  • Humans
  • Heart-Assist Devices
  • Heart Failure
  • Exercise Tolerance
  • Exercise Test
  • Cardiotonic Agents
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Starling, R. C., Estep, J. D., Horstmanshof, D. A., Milano, C. A., Stehlik, J., Shah, K. B., … ROADMAP Study Investigators, . (2017). Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results. In JACC Heart Fail (Vol. 5, pp. 518–527). United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016
Starling, Randall C., Jerry D. Estep, Douglas A. Horstmanshof, Carmelo A. Milano, Josef Stehlik, Keyur B. Shah, Brian A. Bruckner, et al. “Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results.” In JACC Heart Fail, 5:518–27, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016.
Starling RC, Estep JD, Horstmanshof DA, Milano CA, Stehlik J, Shah KB, et al. Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results. In: JACC Heart Fail. 2017. p. 518–27.
Starling, Randall C., et al. “Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results.JACC Heart Fail, vol. 5, no. 7, 2017, pp. 518–27. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016.
Starling RC, Estep JD, Horstmanshof DA, Milano CA, Stehlik J, Shah KB, Bruckner BA, Lee S, Long JW, Selzman CH, Kasirajan V, Haas DC, Boyle AJ, Chuang J, Farrar DJ, Rogers JG, ROADMAP Study Investigators. Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results. JACC Heart Fail. 2017. p. 518–527.
Journal cover image

Published In

JACC Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

2213-1787

Publication Date

July 2017

Volume

5

Issue

7

Start / End Page

518 / 527

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Assessment
  • Quality of Life
  • Prospective Studies
  • Humans
  • Heart-Assist Devices
  • Heart Failure
  • Exercise Tolerance
  • Exercise Test
  • Cardiotonic Agents