Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Self-reported family history of leiomyoma: not a reliable marker of high risk.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Saldana, TM; Moshesh, M; Baird, DD
Published in: Annals of epidemiology
May 2013

To examine the importance of self-reported family history of uterine leiomyoma (fibroids) as a marker of risk.Women, aged 35 to 49, were randomly selected from the membership of a large, urban health plan. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire about family history of fibroids. Ultrasound screening for fibroids followed, regardless of whether participants had been previously diagnosed (660 black, 412 white). Data for each ethnic group were analyzed separately using Poisson regression.In both ethnic groups, women who reported a family history of fibroids had an elevated risk of fibroids compared with those without family history. However, no elevated risk was apparent for cases who did not know they had fibroids when they reported the family history information.Many women may first learn about their family history of fibroids when discussing their own clinical diagnosis with family members. Such bias would invalidate self-reported family history as a predictor of fibroid risk. As new pharmacologic treatments for fibroids are developed, women at high risk of fibroids would benefit from early screening and pharmacologic treatment to delay development of large fibroids and reduce the need for invasive treatments. Self-reported family history is not useful for identifying high-risk women.

Published In

Annals of epidemiology

DOI

EISSN

1873-2585

ISSN

1047-2797

Publication Date

May 2013

Volume

23

Issue

5

Start / End Page

286 / 290

Related Subject Headings

  • White People
  • Uterine Neoplasms
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Self Report
  • Risk Factors
  • Regression Analysis
  • North Carolina
  • Middle Aged
  • Leiomyoma
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Saldana, T. M., Moshesh, M., & Baird, D. D. (2013). Self-reported family history of leiomyoma: not a reliable marker of high risk. Annals of Epidemiology, 23(5), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.03.003
Saldana, Tina Marie, Malana Moshesh, and Donna Day Baird. “Self-reported family history of leiomyoma: not a reliable marker of high risk.Annals of Epidemiology 23, no. 5 (May 2013): 286–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.03.003.
Saldana TM, Moshesh M, Baird DD. Self-reported family history of leiomyoma: not a reliable marker of high risk. Annals of epidemiology. 2013 May;23(5):286–90.
Saldana, Tina Marie, et al. “Self-reported family history of leiomyoma: not a reliable marker of high risk.Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 23, no. 5, May 2013, pp. 286–90. Epmc, doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.03.003.
Saldana TM, Moshesh M, Baird DD. Self-reported family history of leiomyoma: not a reliable marker of high risk. Annals of epidemiology. 2013 May;23(5):286–290.
Journal cover image

Published In

Annals of epidemiology

DOI

EISSN

1873-2585

ISSN

1047-2797

Publication Date

May 2013

Volume

23

Issue

5

Start / End Page

286 / 290

Related Subject Headings

  • White People
  • Uterine Neoplasms
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Self Report
  • Risk Factors
  • Regression Analysis
  • North Carolina
  • Middle Aged
  • Leiomyoma