Skip to main content

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Thomas, MP; Parzynski, CS; Curtis, JP; Seth, M; Nallamothu, BK; Chan, PS; Spertus, JA; Patel, MR; Bradley, SM; Gurm, HS
Published in: PLoS One
2015

BACKGROUND: Substantial geographic variation exists in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use across the United States. It is unclear the extent to which high PCI utilization can be explained by PCI for inappropriate indications. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between PCI rates across regional healthcare markets utilizing hospital referral regions (HRRs) and PCI appropriateness. METHODS: The number of PCI procedures in each HRR was obtained from the 2010 100% Medicare limited data set. HRRs were divided into quintiles of PCI utilization with increasing rates of utilization progressing to quintile 5. NCDR CathPCI Registry® data were used to evaluate patient characteristics, appropriate use criteria (AUC), and outcomes across the HRR quintiles defined by PCI utilization with the study population restricted to HRRs where ≥ 80% of the PCIs were performed at institutions participating in the registry. PCI appropriateness was defined using 2012 AUC by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). RESULTS: Our study cohort comprised of 380,981 patients treated at 178 HRRs. Mean PCI rates per 1,000 increased from 4.6 in Quintile 1 to 10.8 in Quintile 5. The proportion of non-acute PCIs was 27.7% in Quintile 1 increasing to 30.7% in Quintile 5. Significant variation (p < 0.001) existed across the quintiles in the categorization of appropriateness across HRRs of utilization with more appropriate PCI in lower utilization areas (Appropriate: Q1, 76.53%, Q2, 75.326%, Q3, 75.23%, Q4, 73.95%, Q5, 72.768%; Inappropriate: Q1 3.92%, Q2 4.23%, Q3 4.32%, Q4 4.35%, Q5 4.05%; Uncertain: Q1 8.29%, Q2 8.84%, Q3 8.08%, Q4 9.01%, Q5 8.93%; Not Mappable: Q1 11.26%, Q2 11.67%, Q3 12.37%, Q4 12.69%, Q5 14.34%). There was no difference in risk-adjusted mortality across quintiles of PCI utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic regions with lower PCI rates have a higher proportion of PCIs performed for appropriate indications. Areas that perform more PCIs also appear to perform more elective PCI and many could not be mapped by the AUC.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

2015

Volume

10

Issue

9

Start / End Page

e0138251

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Registries
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Patient Selection
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hospitals
  • General Science & Technology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Thomas, M. P., Parzynski, C. S., Curtis, J. P., Seth, M., Nallamothu, B. K., Chan, P. S., … Gurm, H. S. (2015). Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States. PLoS One, 10(9), e0138251. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138251
Thomas, Michael P., Craig S. Parzynski, Jeptha P. Curtis, Milan Seth, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Paul S. Chan, John A. Spertus, Manesh R. Patel, Steven M. Bradley, and Hitinder S. Gurm. “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States.PLoS One 10, no. 9 (2015): e0138251. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138251.
Thomas MP, Parzynski CS, Curtis JP, Seth M, Nallamothu BK, Chan PS, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138251.
Thomas, Michael P., et al. “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States.PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 9, 2015, p. e0138251. Pubmed, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138251.
Thomas MP, Parzynski CS, Curtis JP, Seth M, Nallamothu BK, Chan PS, Spertus JA, Patel MR, Bradley SM, Gurm HS. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138251.

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

2015

Volume

10

Issue

9

Start / End Page

e0138251

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Registries
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Patient Selection
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hospitals
  • General Science & Technology